Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Controversial Ethereum Proposal Would Fund Development From Validator Rewards - Unchained
A new and contentious Ethereum proposal would create a protocol-level funding mechanism paid for by validators, and it has already drawn sharp reactions from the community. Authored by Clément Lesaege, founder and CTO of Kleros, the “Validator Redirected Revenue” proposal would let validators redirect a share of their staking rewards toward ecosystem funding.
The core mechanic is a majority trigger. If more than 50% of validators signal a redirect rate above zero, the contribution becomes mandatory for all validators, capped at a maximum of 10% of staking rewards. Lesaege frames the status quo as a free-rider problem, in which everyone benefits from shared infrastructure but no single actor wants to pay, creating a persistent drag on Ethereum’s competitiveness.
This story is an excerpt from the Unchained Daily newsletter.
Subscribe here to get these updates in your email for free
The design deliberately avoids hardcoding any recipient or funding minimum. Validators specify preferred recipient addresses, and execution clients aggregate those preferences into a splitter contract through a “king of the hill” mechanism that converges on the distribution most validators favor. Lesaege acknowledged open risks, chiefly validator cartelization and the fact that roughly 90% of ETH is staked through operators rather than solo stakers. The debate sits adjacent to a longer-running discussion over Ethereum issuance and shrinking validator rewards.
Reactions split quickly with Gnosis co-founder Martin Köppelmann calling it the first public-goods funding proposal he wouldn’t dismiss immediately, praising its lack of a hardcoded recipient or minimum. Ex-Ethereum researcher Dankrad Feist was dismissive, sarcastically tying the idea to wanting payment for work, while quoting MetaLeX Labs CEO Gabriel Shapiro, who argued such proposals come from insiders trying to preserve influence as Ethereum turns more capitalistic. On ethresear.ch, developer MicahZoltu warned the cartel problem remains unsolved.
Related Listen: Is the Ethereum Foundation Too Out of Touch to Save ETH?