[Bit推] Recently, a Crypto DAO has conducted an architectural upgrade, focusing on “full transparency.”
How exactly to play? Reserve funds can be verified for open-source, authority is not determined by one person but managed by multiple parties, the core contract directly restricts asset transfers, all operational traces are recorded on-chain, and rewards are automatically distributed by smart contracts.
What are the benefits of this logic? How does the system operate? There is no need for people to explain - the on-chain data will speak for itself. How reserves change, how parameters are executed, how rewards are distributed, all depend on the contracts, reducing the uncertainties brought about by human intervention.
For participants, it is clearer to understand how the structure operates; for those researching reserve mechanisms or looking to establish long-term systems, these recorded engineering conditions are also quite valuable as references. The path of transparency, at least on a technical level, has entrusted the matter of “trust” to code.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedDreams
· 21h ago
Code can't run human nature; sooner or later, someone has to maintain the contract.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 21h ago
Can code deceive? No, but audit reports can...
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretful
· 21h ago
That said, this trap sounds good, but I just want to ask - who audits the contract code itself? If a bug really appears, won't it still cost lives...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 21h ago
That said, this trap sounds good, but on-chain transparency ≠ real transparency. Has the code been audited? A contract with vulnerabilities is useless regardless.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 21h ago
Sounds good, but the key question is whether this trap smart contracts has been audited? It seems like many projects boast about this, but in the end, they still face issues due to code vulnerabilities gg.
A certain Crypto DAO transparency upgrade: reserves verifiable, contracts running automatically, on-chain data speaks for itself.
[Bit推] Recently, a Crypto DAO has conducted an architectural upgrade, focusing on “full transparency.”
How exactly to play? Reserve funds can be verified for open-source, authority is not determined by one person but managed by multiple parties, the core contract directly restricts asset transfers, all operational traces are recorded on-chain, and rewards are automatically distributed by smart contracts.
What are the benefits of this logic? How does the system operate? There is no need for people to explain - the on-chain data will speak for itself. How reserves change, how parameters are executed, how rewards are distributed, all depend on the contracts, reducing the uncertainties brought about by human intervention.
For participants, it is clearer to understand how the structure operates; for those researching reserve mechanisms or looking to establish long-term systems, these recorded engineering conditions are also quite valuable as references. The path of transparency, at least on a technical level, has entrusted the matter of “trust” to code.