The Aave community recently initiated a critical temperature check - re-evaluating the multi-chain layout strategy of V3.
The core idea is very clear: for those underperforming networks, directly increase the reserve ratio and focus on increasing protocol revenue first. Even more drastic, for the markets on chains like zkSync, Metis, and Soneium where the returns are not ideal, it is suggested to simply shut them down.
Looking ahead, the newly deployed instances must have hard indicators - an annual income of at least 2 million dollars must be reached before considering going online. In simple terms, this operation aims to concentrate resources on the truly viable battlefields and avoid the previous scattershot approach.
DeFi protocols have entered a refined operational phase; having more chains is not necessarily better, it depends on actual output.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatcher
· 13h ago
They're really starting to clear the battlefield. Is the yield on zkSync that bad? I don't understand what Aave is still hesitating about; they should have done this long ago.
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamer
· 13h ago
Finally, there is a protocol that dares to take action. The $2 million threshold is brilliant; no more supporting idlers.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGwei
· 13h ago
The $2 million threshold is a bit harsh; it feels like the small chains are really going to be pushed out.
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 13h ago
It should have been this way a long time ago; spreading out across multiple chains is purely a waste of gas fees. A $2 million threshold isn't too high; keep the chains that can make money, and shutting down the others can actually improve efficiency. Aave has finally come to its senses this time.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 13h ago
You really have to learn to let go. The previous trap of multi-chain expansion was just burning money, and now someone finally dares to take action.
Aave Community Proposal: Major Adjustment to Multi-Chain Strategy, Setting a $2 Million Income Threshold
The Aave community recently initiated a critical temperature check - re-evaluating the multi-chain layout strategy of V3.
The core idea is very clear: for those underperforming networks, directly increase the reserve ratio and focus on increasing protocol revenue first. Even more drastic, for the markets on chains like zkSync, Metis, and Soneium where the returns are not ideal, it is suggested to simply shut them down.
Looking ahead, the newly deployed instances must have hard indicators - an annual income of at least 2 million dollars must be reached before considering going online. In simple terms, this operation aims to concentrate resources on the truly viable battlefields and avoid the previous scattershot approach.
DeFi protocols have entered a refined operational phase; having more chains is not necessarily better, it depends on actual output.