I've seen this scenario too many times: a development team spends months fine-tuning an "all-knowing, all-powerful" AI model, only to launch it and find there are more bugs than features. Want a single model to write code, analyze data, and handle user inquiries? Sounds great in theory, but in practice it’s a disaster.
The DeFAI space is pretty lively right now, with everyone trying to build the "strongest AI." But there’s one team taking a different approach—instead of exhausting one model by making it do everything poorly, they’re assembling a squad of specialized AI models. Each model focuses on doing one thing well, and together they can solve more complex problems.
This approach is actually pretty smart. Just like you wouldn’t expect a general practitioner to perform heart surgery and fix your teeth, AI models are the same—specialized tasks require specialized "people."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaMillionairen't
· 12-05 10:51
Haha, it's true. A bunch of projects want to build an all-in-one model, but end up being mediocre at everything.
I think this division of labor model is more reliable; professional matters should be handled by professional teams.
The DeFAI track is basically a high-stakes gamble right now, and only a few will survive.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 12-05 10:43
Haha, finally someone said it. Claiming that one model can solve all problems is just nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourer
· 12-05 10:40
Haha, that's the charm of division of labor. If a single model greedily tries to do everything, it ends up being mediocre at everything. It's better to have several specialists each doing their own job well.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrownies
· 12-05 10:37
If one model tries to do everything, it ends up failing at everything—I’ve been tired of seeing that for a long time. Team-based approaches are more reliable, with everyone playing their own role.
I've seen this scenario too many times: a development team spends months fine-tuning an "all-knowing, all-powerful" AI model, only to launch it and find there are more bugs than features. Want a single model to write code, analyze data, and handle user inquiries? Sounds great in theory, but in practice it’s a disaster.
The DeFAI space is pretty lively right now, with everyone trying to build the "strongest AI." But there’s one team taking a different approach—instead of exhausting one model by making it do everything poorly, they’re assembling a squad of specialized AI models. Each model focuses on doing one thing well, and together they can solve more complex problems.
This approach is actually pretty smart. Just like you wouldn’t expect a general practitioner to perform heart surgery and fix your teeth, AI models are the same—specialized tasks require specialized "people."