I recently saw some news: the US has made a move on AI chip exports—but the way they’re doing it is pretty strange.
Simply put, Nvidia and AMD can now sell high-performance chips to China, but there’s a catch: for every chip sold, they have to pay a 25% “protection fee” to the US government. You might think this is just a tech industry issue, but it actually has a big impact on mining and the computing power market.
Let’s talk about the two sides of this. The good news is that the global computing power supply chain might get a breather. AI training and crypto mining both compete for the same batch of high-performance computing hardware. Previously, a bunch of AI companies in the US were demanding priority for domestic supply, but now that this door is open—even though the top-tier chips still aren’t allowed—chips like the H200, which are still powerful, can be sold. This gives miners a potential new source, which isn’t a bad thing.
But the downside is obvious: costs will definitely go up. This 25% “tax” will ultimately be passed on to buyers—whether you’re an AI company or a mining farm owner, you’ll have to pay more for mining machines. What’s more troublesome is the policy risk—this is clearly a product of interest trade-offs, and there’s no guarantee the policy won’t change direction at any time.
So, what should retail investors think about this? My advice is don’t rush to chase the hype. As soon as the news breaks, those AI- and compute-linked altcoins might see a quick emotional surge, but these short-term rallies are often traps. If you really want to make a move, it’s better to keep an eye on price fluctuations in the mining machine market. If chip supply really increases, the cost and lead time for new mining machines may change.
At the end of the day, Bitcoin’s core logic has never relied on policy windfalls—its value lies in decentralization and censorship resistance. The more complex the geopolitical games, the more decentralized the global computing power distribution becomes, which is actually good for network security in the long run. So don’t be led by short-term news, be patient, wait for opportunities, and strike when the time is right.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConsensusDissenter
· 12-12 22:28
25% tax? Isn't this just a disguised chip embargo? The US approach is becoming more direct.
It's yet another geopolitical game; miners may enjoy short-term benefits, but in the long run, they still have to pay for this "incentive."
Speculation on altcoins is purely a game for bagholders; I don't participate.
Decentralized computing power is exactly what Bitcoin needs. Ironically, political confrontation has only strengthened this characteristic.
Don't follow the trend; wait until the mining machine prices truly move before acting. Chasing hot topics now just makes you a newbie.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 12-11 23:07
A 25% tax directly added to the cost, miners are about to collapse.
---
Once again, policy risk. The worst-case scenario is that if they open up today, they could shut down tomorrow.
---
Chip price increases lead to higher mining machine costs. The opportunity for retail investors to buy the dip has arrived, right?
---
Don't follow the hype around those clone coins; it's really just a game for bagholders.
---
Supply chain relief is fake; only when costs go up is it real.
---
Decentralization is the way to go. Policy swings actually prove this point.
---
Is the H200 enough? It still feels like it's being cornered. The US’s move is really shady.
---
Keep a close eye on the rising costs of mining machines; there will definitely be variables later.
---
The core logic of Bitcoin remains unchanged. These geopolitical disputes are actually beneficial for long-term optimism.
---
Short-term clone coins riding the trend are not worth touching; they are full of traps.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 12-11 17:04
25% tax? That's obviously a way to cash in on retail investors, and in the end, it just hits the retail traders.
---
It's another policy risk. I've seen this trick many times—price spikes in the short term, then the market gets cut.
---
Oh no, the cost of mining machines is going up again, and my little wallet is shrinking.
---
Basically, the US just wants to exploit profits again, but decentralized hash power actually stabilizes the network. I agree with this logic.
---
Don't chase after those trending coins; there are too many traps. I've learned to be smarter.
---
Wait, is this a covert transfer of benefits? Feels more and more complicated.
---
The core remains that Bitcoin's strength lies in decentralization. Policies can't really play any tricks here.
---
H200 is powerful enough, but costs are rising. How will miners balance the books?
---
Retail investors should honestly watch the market trends and not be led by news.
---
Focusing on mining machine prices is indeed the way out; when the supply chain changes, opportunities arise.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 12-09 22:59
Here we go again, in the end, the 25% tax will still be paid by consumers, and miners are the ones suffering.
Retail investors should never get rekt by shitcoins; keeping an eye on mining machine price fluctuations is what really matters.
Decentralization is fundamental, and you really need to be cautious about policy risks.
Wait and see, don’t rush to act.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaser
· 12-09 22:58
25% protection fee? That's just a disguised price increase, miners' blood pressure must be skyrocketing.
You can sell Chinese chips but have to pay taxes, the US really knows how to play this game. In the end, retail investors are the ones who pay.
The H200 is sufficient but not top-tier, who can really predict policy risks?
Don't chase those AI concept coins, it's just wave after wave of retail investors getting fleeced. It's more practical to watch changes in miner costs.
Bitcoin doesn't rely on that 25% to survive, decentralization is becoming more appealing.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 12-09 22:54
Another round of fleecing retail investors—25% protection fee? Honestly, it's just a disguised price hike.
I don't get this move; chip costs are loosening but prices are going up, and miners are still getting squeezed?
Don't buy into the talk about long-term value. If you jump in short-term, you're just the bag holder. I'll wait and see.
I recently saw some news: the US has made a move on AI chip exports—but the way they’re doing it is pretty strange.
Simply put, Nvidia and AMD can now sell high-performance chips to China, but there’s a catch: for every chip sold, they have to pay a 25% “protection fee” to the US government. You might think this is just a tech industry issue, but it actually has a big impact on mining and the computing power market.
Let’s talk about the two sides of this. The good news is that the global computing power supply chain might get a breather. AI training and crypto mining both compete for the same batch of high-performance computing hardware. Previously, a bunch of AI companies in the US were demanding priority for domestic supply, but now that this door is open—even though the top-tier chips still aren’t allowed—chips like the H200, which are still powerful, can be sold. This gives miners a potential new source, which isn’t a bad thing.
But the downside is obvious: costs will definitely go up. This 25% “tax” will ultimately be passed on to buyers—whether you’re an AI company or a mining farm owner, you’ll have to pay more for mining machines. What’s more troublesome is the policy risk—this is clearly a product of interest trade-offs, and there’s no guarantee the policy won’t change direction at any time.
So, what should retail investors think about this? My advice is don’t rush to chase the hype. As soon as the news breaks, those AI- and compute-linked altcoins might see a quick emotional surge, but these short-term rallies are often traps. If you really want to make a move, it’s better to keep an eye on price fluctuations in the mining machine market. If chip supply really increases, the cost and lead time for new mining machines may change.
At the end of the day, Bitcoin’s core logic has never relied on policy windfalls—its value lies in decentralization and censorship resistance. The more complex the geopolitical games, the more decentralized the global computing power distribution becomes, which is actually good for network security in the long run. So don’t be led by short-term news, be patient, wait for opportunities, and strike when the time is right.