An interesting market incident occurred— a large holder of tokens wanted to take advantage of a stablecoin offering a 20% annualized return, planning to exchange their Bitcoin for this high-yield token. What was initially just a casual trading idea unexpectedly hit a liquidity trap.



Where did the problem arise? The trading pool for that stablecoin simply couldn't handle such a large order. A multi-million dollar exchange order was placed, causing liquidity to dry up instantly, and the token price collapsed accordingly. The BTC transaction price was forcibly driven down to around $24,000, with an absurdly large slippage.

What’s even more painful is that even if the funds are later transferred into that 20% annualized project, relying on interest compounding, it would still be impossible to recover the losses from this wave of decline. This actually reflects a very real issue—high returns often come with high risks and hidden pitfalls. Small pools lack liquidity, and large transactions can easily cause extreme slippage. These are essential insights to understand when entering the space.
BTC-0.16%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainSleuthvip
· 4h ago
This is the cost of greed. A 20% annualized rate sounds great, but a slippage can slap you awake in an instant.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 4h ago
actually, this is basically AMM 101 gone wrong — theoretically speaking, when you're dealing with constant product formula dynamics, a multi-million order into a shallow pool creates statistically significant price impact that's... well, entirely preventable if people bothered checking k = x*y first. the 20% apy cope is just mathematically embarrassing at that point.
Reply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 4h ago
This is a classic case of greed causing trouble. Dare to go all-in with a 20% annual return, and this is the outcome when playing big in a small pond.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoFortuneTellervip
· 4h ago
Same old trick again, does Xiao Chi Zi dare to give 20%? Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)