2025-12-24 17:22:02

SRC Token - Do Your Own Research

Looking at this emerging token project, here's what the development team is putting out there:

The developer made headlines recently by going public with a genuine commitment to transparency. They went the extra mile to show their face while emphasizing their involvement in the project—complete with chicken-themed attire that's become part of the project's quirky branding. It's unconventional, sure, but it signals something: the dev is willing to put themselves out there.

What caught attention is their explicit statement that every single dollar spent from the development fund goes directly into project growth and sustainability. No hidden agendas, no off-the-book expenses. At least, that's the narrative they're pushing.

For anyone considering jumping into SRC, the usual rules apply: do your homework, check the contract details, verify the team's track record, and understand the tokenomics. New projects come with new risks. The developer's transparency play is a plus—but transparency alone doesn't guarantee success.

This is the kind of project where community research and due diligence aren't optional; they're essential. Watch how the team executes, how they communicate with holders, and whether their actions match their words over time.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RetailTherapist

· 3h ago

Is high transparency necessarily reliable? I don't think so... Even a chicken suit is on, so what are you afraid of, not daring to face the light? --- Come on, every dollar is used on the project? What about the fundraising part? I've heard this excuse too many times. --- The same old saying, no matter how transparent, it still depends on whether they can truly deliver; otherwise, it's just high-level marketing. --- Developers willing to show their faces definitely add value, but how many projects end up disappearing into thin air... DYOR (Do Your Own Research) is never wrong. --- Strange brand personas, transparent storytelling, community research... sounds like they're just trying to whitewash themselves. --- New projects, new risks. Everyone understands this concept, but I'm just worried that even after understanding, they'll still get cut. --- Instead of trusting promises, it's better to wait and see if they're still around after three months. That’s true transparency.

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 3h ago

actually... chicken suits and "transparency theater" don't tell us anything about the cryptographic primitives they're using. where's the formal verification? where's the audit trail for those fund allocations?

Reply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 3h ago

Wearing chicken-themed transparent outfits... Just shouting about it is useless, let's see how they execute it later. --- Are the funds really all used on projects? We need time to verify. --- Another new project, more homework to do... When will we encounter a truly reliable one? --- It's a plus that developers dare to show their faces, but I'm more concerned about how well the contract code is written. --- Transparency ≠ profit, everyone. Don't be fooled by appearances. --- Chicken-themed clothing is a bit crazy haha, but at least it has some personality. --- Tokenomics is the real focus, everything else is just hype. --- Waiting here to see if the team will drop the ball.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTrapper

· 3h ago

lmao chicken suits and "transparency" narratives... actually if you read the contract there's probably 18 different wallet clusters. called this exact play like six months ago

Reply0

WenMoon

· 3h ago

Wearing chicken costumes to talk about transparency, I've seen this trick too many times haha Wait, where exactly is the so-called development fund going? Need to keep a close eye on it Consistency between words and actions is the key. I am the kind of person who judges by execution Another DYOR project, forget it, I’ll check out others’ research results first Sounds like adding bricks to the sample library for a risk management course

View OriginalReply0

BankruptcyArtist

· 3h ago

Wearing chicken costumes to promote coins? Fine, at least they dare to show their faces... Let's see how the contract performs later. --- High transparency is good, but these days, who doesn't claim to be transparent? The key is whether they can deliver. --- Chicken-themed clothing haha... This team is indeed a bit different, but I still want to see how their actual execution capability is. --- Another project claiming "we are very transparent"... Brothers, don't just listen, you need to check the tokenomics yourself. --- Funds directly used for growth? Just listen, supervising their actions is more reliable. --- Developers stepping up counts for something, but new coins come with new risks—this logic always holds. --- That chicken costume... creative points, but whether they can really deliver depends on what happens next. --- DYOR (Do Your Own Research) always comes first. No matter how transparent a team is, don't go all in blindly.

View OriginalReply0