The套路 in the crypto market is always like this. An ambiguous symbol appears in an animation, and immediately someone starts to speculate, claiming it predicts a certain coin will experience a surge. LUNC recently went through this scene, with reasons sounding grand: a leading exchange is burning tokens, community popularity is high, supply has decreased—it's as if everything is waiting for that one pop culture coincidence to ignite the fuse.

Watching this kind of investment logic built on cartoon plots, I can only shake my head. To be honest, when market narratives rely on animations for support, you should ask yourself: is this money really worth such a gamble?

I didn't follow the trend to dig up the latest episodes for "hints," but instead did something more practical—review my core asset allocation. Fortunately, most of my holdings no longer depend on "prophecies." They are stored in stablecoins, enjoying yields from on-chain over-collateralization mechanisms. The value here isn't maintained by cartoonists' pens or by exchange's periodic burn announcements, but by transparent mathematical models and verifiable economic mechanisms.

This is what I understand as "trust through stability"—trust doesn't come from pop culture Easter eggs, but from on-chain data and protocol designs that you can see and verify.

**The Gap Between Narrative and Reality**

This wave of "narrative frenzy" in LUNC is actually a microcosm of the entire crypto market. When project teams start using stories, emotions, and external events to drive price expectations, risks are already accumulating. Burning mechanisms do exist in reality, but their impact on price is long-term and gradual, definitely not as dramatic as "a symbol appears and it immediately takes off."

In contrast, stable mechanisms based on economics seem more solid. On-chain collateralization, protocol yields, transparent liquidation—these don't make headlines or trend on social media, but they are operating at every moment, providing security for asset stability.

Is investing about betting on stories, or about asset allocation? Everyone should seriously consider this question.