$282 million whale theft case investigation: hacker social engineering scams followed by cross-chain money laundering

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【CoinPost】Another major case. A whale investor fell victim to social engineering scams, and their hardware wallet was directly compromised, with the asset loss reaching an astonishing scale—over $282 million combined in Litecoin and Bitcoin.

The timeline is locked at approximately 11:00 PM on January 10, 2026, UTC. On-chain data monitoring shows that the stolen funds were subsequently moved in batches by the hackers. About $63 million was transferred via a cross-chain bridge to an address starting with 0xF73, and then entered further mixing and money laundering processes.

According to the on-chain detective’s tracking results, this was not a simple one-time transfer. The hackers clearly planned the fund flow carefully, using cross-chain bridging to break single-chain traceability and increase law enforcement difficulty. This technique is becoming increasingly common in large-scale thefts—initial social engineering breaches the wallet defenses, followed by immediate cross-chain dispersal, and finally long-term concealment through mixers or scattered addresses.

For on-chain traders, this is yet another wake-up call. No matter how secure a hardware wallet is, once the private key or recovery phrase is exposed through social engineering, all cold storage becomes useless. Two-factor authentication, privacy settings, and information isolation—these basic precautions really cannot be skipped.

LTC1.71%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationHuntervip
· 22h ago
Damn, another social engineering attack? Hardware wallets have been compromised, which shows this guy's defenses are really weak. Once again, a textbook example of cross-chain money laundering. Hackers' techniques are becoming more and more sophisticated. 280 million directly evaporated—that must hurt a lot.
View OriginalReply0
OneBlockAtATimevip
· 22h ago
It's the same old social engineering tactics... Hardware wallets can't even prevent it, which is really outrageous—2.82 billion just gone. Cross-chain money laundering is now everywhere, and with a set of mixers, it's basically impossible to trace.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walkingvip
· 22h ago
It's the same old social engineering tricks again; hardware wallets can't even prevent this... The cross-chain money laundering process is indeed slick, and after using a mixer, there's basically no chance.
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamervip
· 22h ago
Social engineering is truly incredible—can even break hardware wallets? 282 million directly lost, this method is becoming more professional and terrifying. --- Cross-chain transfers in a second, funds dispersed instantly, mixing services make it almost impossible to recover. --- It's another cross-chain bridge and decentralized address—hackers are turning money laundering into an art form. --- This whale too—how could they be fooled by social engineering... no matter how much money they have, it's useless. --- Watching on-chain data still flying, but the money has already vanished—it's truly helpless. --- Address 0xF73 is now definitely on the blacklist, but what's the use? --- Every time a big case like this happens, I think of that saying—your private key is your everything. --- Mixing services are really the hacker's best friend; law enforcement can't keep up no matter how strong they are.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 22h ago
Both social engineering and cross-chain attacks—this combo is now standard... Hardware wallets have been compromised, indicating that the defenses have long been breached. Truly outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)