2026-01-19 13:27:18

Speaking of $XPL , my opinion on it has actually been gradually formed over a complete cycle.

When I first paid attention to it, my mood was pretty good, and there was some movement in the price, so I followed the trend and bought some. Later, as the market weakened, it gave me a chance to reassess this project, and I added some positions at relatively low levels.

After experiencing the ups and downs, my mindset has changed. I no longer get so caught up in short-term fluctuations; instead, I focus on the overall trend structure. Looking at the current candlestick chart, XPL hasn't shown a clear downward trend; more often, it’s just oscillating within a certain range. For those who have experienced bull and bear markets, this is actually very important — it indicates that the market hasn't completely negated it.

What I pay special attention to is its rhythm during declines. XPL doesn’t show continuous volume surges during sharp drops, and its price corrections are relatively gentle. What does this mean? It suggests that the selling pressure isn’t concentrated, but rather the market is slowly completing a handover. Projects that are truly heading for a bad trend usually show more direct and fierce movements.

My decision to add positions at low levels isn’t based on intuition. I observe that its structure is still intact, and key support levels haven’t been effectively broken, so I decide to give it more time rather than rushing to draw conclusions.

Volume is also on my watchlist. XPL hasn’t experienced sudden disappearance of trading activity, indicating that market interest still exists. A project that is completely negated usually sees liquidity rapidly dry up — this is a very reliable indicator.

Community activity is also worth watching. The project still sees ongoing discussions on relevant platforms, which shows that people are still observing and evaluating, rather than quickly labeling and moving on. The continuation of this heat itself is a signal.

Looking back now, buying at the high points taught me how to manage emotions, and adding at low levels taught me what patience really means. Instead of chasing the ups and downs to make judgments, it’s better to focus on things that can’t be deceived — structure, volume, and heat — these are the real market signals.

XPL-1.49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DancingCandles

· 01-22 11:18

This guy is right, the structure is really the key, much more reliable than those who shout buy all day long. I truly admire the courage to add positions at low levels; most people have already cut losses and run. It's comfortable to see that trading volume hasn't dried up, indicating it hasn't turned into a zombie market. Wait, can community buzz really be a signal? I think sometimes when there's a lot of discussion, it's actually the most dangerous time for the project. This mindset is indeed seasoned; having gone through several cycles makes a difference. As long as the key support hasn't broken, it's indeed a valid trend line, but I've seen projects where support is pierced countless times, then they find new support, cycle after cycle... But this kind of rational analysis is definitely clearer than blindly chasing after explosive gains. Structure, volume, buzz—note these down. Next time you analyze the market, focus on these three.

View OriginalReply0

SudoRm-RfWallet/

· 01-21 10:51

This guy's analysis does have some substance, but I'm more concerned about the real chip changes rather than candlestick stories. Low-position turnover sounds good, but who can guarantee it's not the manipulators shaking out the weak? That's why I never all in on a single project. What does the trading volume indicate? It shows that there are still people fighting inside, or it could just be a burial ground. No need to say more. Community enthusiasm continues... Haha, I've seen too many communities that eventually turn into tombs. Sometimes the topic heat is even more intense than the project itself.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-21 08:49

Really speaking, buying in at a higher point does come with a learning curve, but looking at it from another perspective makes things clearer. This wave of correction actually helped me see through XPL. The trading volume hasn't collapsed, which means there are still people taking positions. As long as the structure isn't broken, we just have to wait. No more following the trend; just focus on trading volume and community enthusiasm. These two can't be fooled. Now it's a patience game—who has the steadier mindset.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSage

· 01-19 13:57

This guy really treats buying the dip as a philosophy. Why can't I stay so calm? Daring to add positions before the support level breaks shows you need to be more familiar with this technical analysis. The judgment that trading volume doesn't disappear is actually reliable. It's much more meaningful than superficial indicators like community popularity. Speaking of which, the experience of catching the top can really test your patience, especially whether your wallet can hold up first... Those still observing XPL now are probably people with stories.

View OriginalReply0

Ramen_Until_Rich

· 01-19 13:56

This guy is saying some real stuff, but I still think that adding positions at low levels is just gambling on popularity. No matter how good the indicators look, they can't save a bad project. Having a clear logic is good, but it feels a bit like "I've discovered a secret"... Volume can be very deceptive sometimes. Hmm, I haven't heard anyone talk about rhythm from this perspective before. It’s indeed more reliable than just looking at candlestick charts. This is the self-cultivation after experiencing being trapped. I used to deceive myself this way too, but I later realized that sometimes you just get it wrong. Is the community still discussing? That’s probably just the chives still talking... Haha, just kidding. Not breaking the structure is indeed a signal, but signals can be good or bad. This is a neutral signal. The logic for adding positions is clear, but I’m just worried that in the end, it will all die out before dawn. Being patient sounds nice, but in harsh words, it’s just being stuck and unwilling to cut losses. Still, the mindset is definitely better than when you first entered.

View OriginalReply0

HashBard

· 01-19 13:54

the delicious irony here is watching someone actually *learn* from getting rekt lmao. most people just double down on the copium, but this reads like someone who genuinely sat with the pain and extracted signal from the noise. structure over emotion—now that's a narrative arc worth following, ngl

Reply0

LightningHarvester

· 01-19 13:40

This guy seems to be paying close attention, but I still think there's a bit of uncertainty with XPL this time... Dipping to add positions sounds rational, but ask yourself: are you really analyzing the structure or just betting on a rebound? The trading volume not drying up is indeed a good sign, but don't be fooled into boiling a frog slowly... Wait and see, don't rush to sell, projects like this are most likely to repeatedly mess with people. Anyone who understands trading knows that the structure can be deceptive many times... XPL is okay, at least it hasn't been vertically crushed, much better than some other projects. That's true, but who decides the definition of a low point? I also bought at the high, now it's just a matter of whether I can hold on until it recovers...

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-19 13:38

Adding to your position at a low level is indeed a smart move; it's much more rational than chasing high. The structure hasn't broken, and trading volume is still there—that's the real signal; everything else is noise. This wave of decline has been quite controlled, unlike those projects that quickly go to zero. Waiting itself is the best trading strategy; unfortunately, most people can't do it. As long as the community remains active, it means there's still hope. Those who are trapped will only complain forever.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 01-19 13:30

This guy really has patience, paying such attention to the details of turnover. --- I've also tried the tactic of adding positions at low levels, but I'm just worried it's a psychological comfort for myself. --- The fact that trading volume doesn't disappear is indeed worth paying attention to; I was fooled by this before. --- Range-bound oscillation is good, at least it proves there are still people willing to buy in. --- The community's enthusiasm continues... really, once no one discusses it, it's basically doomed. --- Looking at this logic, it's just betting that the market hasn't given up on it yet. --- The mentality of buying at high points really needs to be tempered; I was miserable every day back then. --- Structure, volume, and heat—simple, straightforward, and effective—much more reliable than those flashy indicators. --- The problem is how to confirm that the support level really hasn't been broken; this is the easiest way to fool oneself. --- It's true that projects that are denied and liquidity dries up, I've seen too many ways to die like this.

View OriginalReply0