Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, people keep bundling ETF capital flows, U.S. stock market risk appetite, and crypto market ups and downs together for interpretation—I look at it and it’s overwhelming… Anyway, I always see it go down when I’m bullish, so I only dare to study things like “what looks more reliable.”
For beginners, I currently care about credibility in three things: don’t just look at stars on GitHub—check whether anyone has truly been fixing bugs recently; in the issue section, see whether people have been getting seriously responded to after they’ve complained and whether they were taken seriously; don’t treat audit reports as a talisman—see if the scope is written clearly and whether there are any unresolved “known issues”; upgrading multi-sig is the most critical—who the signers are might not be easy to figure out, but at least check the number-of-signatures threshold, whether administrators can be changed casually, and whether there’s a time lock; otherwise, today they say you’ll upgrade, and tomorrow they’ll upgrade you into thin air.
What I fear most isn’t losing money, but getting it wrong and treating “someone is writing” as “someone is responsible”… That’s it for now—smaller position, and I can sleep soundly.