Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I noticed an interesting development in the Korean regulatory landscape. South Korea is actively developing guidelines for corporate investments in cryptocurrencies, but there's an intriguing point — it seems that stablecoins like USDT and USDC might be left out of this new framework.
The reason is quite clear: currency legislation. Korean regulators see pegged dollar stablecoins as a potential conflict with existing currency control rules. This isn't the first time the country has taken a firm stance against dollar tokens — for Korean authorities, sovereignty over the financial system is a very pressing issue.
What does this mean in practice? Corporations will be able to invest in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other altcoins, but assets tied to stablecoins will be more complicated. It's interesting to observe how different countries approach this issue in completely different ways — some treat stablecoins as regular tokens, while others see them as financial instruments requiring separate regulation.
This could influence which assets corporations use for hedging and liquidity. It's worth watching how the final recommendations will look — they could serve as a signal for other Asian regulators.