Talk about a common sense that few people mention in Web3 -
Dividends benefit major shareholders, while buybacks benefit minor shareholders.
Dividends can ensure that most of the profits go to major shareholders. Although buybacks can boost the coin price, it is not easy for major shareholders to reduce their holdings, and if the market depth is not sufficient, they may end up unable to sell. In contrast, small shareholders with smaller amounts can easily take advantage of the situation.
In recent years, US stocks have become more willing to buy back shares, so the overall market trend is ver

Continuous repurchase will ultimately be favourable information for major shareholders, as the K-line indeed affects retail investors getting on board. Retail investors receive various information every day, but most of them will move on if they see the K-line is not good.
If a good line can be maintained, the entry (conversion rate) will rise at a glance, the popularity will also increase, liquidity will deepen, and the floating profit of major shareholders can finally be secured.

To be honest, $Trump token has performed too strongly since 1011. It is speculated that either the market trend is being controlled well, with MM funds abundant and not much affected by 1011, or there are unrelated buyers entering the market, such as offline funds.
The market is really trash now, but this coin truly stands out.

If you are a Hacker, and you know about such a shocking huge vulnerability:
You know that there are many methods for on-chain information forensics now. The RPC you use to initiate transactions can also expose your IP (unless you have a private node). After washing, it's still very difficult to enter an exchange because associated addresses for deposits and withdrawals will be banned. Only a small part of the money can be washed out quickly. Especially if you are not a North Korean Hacker and do not have government physical protection, sooner or later you will be caught and have to cough u

China's rare earth controls do not take effect immediately and appear to be just a bargaining chip for the meeting at the end of the month.
In contrast, Trump threatened to impose a 100% tariff, which was initially just a threat, and he said it would take effect next month. This also indicates that it is to create leverage for the meeting at the end of the month.
Everyone was shocked and had a strong reaction, but the two elderly people made harsh statements precisely for the sake of negotiation. If they didn't intend to negotiate, why mention that it would take effect next month?
So n

Generally speaking, when very bad things happen, most assets first experience a big dump, because the first things to become scarce are the most liquid items, namely cash. Most people do not hold a large amount of cash, so they need to quickly liquidate to make some preparations/adjustments to cope with an uncertain future.
However, once this short-term "cash panic" is over, it quickly moves into the next stage, as the environment becomes bad enough that people will refuse to hoard cash. More and more cash is released and then used to buy back those assets that hold more value in chaos, such a

What would your product achieve without PoL?
Here's an example: for the same ETH-BERA pairs, some pools have a base APR of over 50% (average from 30 days), while others rely entirely on BGT emissions without bribes.
I think the sustainable pool will ultimately win.

This dashboard has been online for over two months, and 50,000 LBGT worth of assets have been burned on Berachain, including MEME tokens from pot2pump and trading airdrops from Wasabee&HoneypotFinance.
According to our data, 70% of the airdropped receipt tokens were not burned. I suspect this is because bots and aggregators account for the vast majority of the 100 million volume.
Thus, for real users, the gains from this are magnified 3x.
Eat well.

Before the launch of Berachain, the main asset was NFT. After the launch, the NFT dropped significantly, and the performance of the newly issued token assets can only be described as mediocre.
However, after consolidating for so long, the asset differentiation has become very clear, and it is easy to identify which ones are truly going to zero and which ones are not.
I personally think it's time to start bottom-fishing for NFT and MEME assets that haven't gone to zero, indicating that the market makers are still accumulating at the bottom. Why recommend NFT and MEME? Because these are