
Recently, the cryptocurrency market experienced a price anomaly that sparked widespread discussion—a brief drop of Bitcoin (BTC) to $24,111 on the Binance BTC/USD1 trading pair, followed by a rapid rebound to nearly $87,000. This extreme volatility quickly spread across social media and market software, raising concerns about whether Bitcoin would experience a flash crash.
However, from the overall market performance, Bitcoin’s price against other mainstream trading pairs has not fallen in tandem, which makes this event more like a localized market structure issue rather than a release of systemic risk.
According to the market data at that time, the BTC/USD1 trading pair showed a significant long lower shadow in a short period, with a minimum touching $24,111. The entire process lasted very briefly, and then the price was quickly pulled back, ultimately returning to the mainstream market price range.
It is worth noting that within the same time window, the prices of high liquidity trading pairs such as BTC/USDT and BTC/USDC remain stable in the range of $86,000 – $88,000. This indicates that the recent “flash crash” has not caused a substantial impact on the overall Bitcoin market, but is more likely the result of abnormal matching in a single trading pair.
The market generally believes that the core reason for this price flash crash is the combination of insufficient liquidity and an imbalance in trading structure.
First of all, USD1 is a relatively new stablecoin, and its market size, user base, and trading depth are significantly weaker than USDT or USDC. In trading pairs with lower liquidity, the order book is usually thin, and once a large market sell order occurs, the price may be quickly suppressed in a short period.
Secondly, during holidays, the overall trading activity in the market decreases, further amplifying liquidity issues. In such an environment, even non-extreme large transactions may have an exaggerated impact on prices.
In addition, some quantitative trading or automated strategies may trigger stop-loss orders or chain sell-offs upon detecting abnormal prices, which can temporarily amplify fluctuations, but the price difference is quickly corrected due to the intervention of arbitrage funds.
Compared to mainstream trading pairs like BTC/USD1 and BTC/USDT, a key difference can be observed: market depth and the number of participants.
Mainstream trading pairs have a large number of market makers, institutional funds, and high-frequency trading participants, which can quickly provide liquidity and suppress extreme volatility when prices deviate. However, the BTC/USD1 trading pair has relatively limited participants and lacks sufficient buy and sell buffers, making the price more susceptible to “pinning” phenomena.
This is also why, in professional trading analysis, investors often prefer to refer to the comprehensive prices from multiple exchanges and various mainstream trading pairs, rather than relying on the real-time quotes of a single market.
After the incident, some investors misjudged the overall trend of Bitcoin without fully understanding the background, leading to fluctuations in market sentiment in the short term. However, as more information was disclosed, the market gradually realized that this was a localized, technical price anomaly.
From an emotional perspective, such events often amplify panic in the short term, but have limited impact on medium to long-term trends. In fact, the overall market structure of Bitcoin, on-chain data, and the macro environment have not fundamentally changed due to this event.
The recent BTC/USD1 flash crash event has provided investors with several important insights:
First, do not judge market trends based solely on a single trading pair. When analyzing the market, multiple mainstream trading pairs and price indices should be considered.
Second, be cautious of trading risks in low liquidity markets. Making large trades in trading pairs with insufficient liquidity can lead to significant slippage or even abnormal transactions.
Thirdly, understanding that a price “flash crash” does not equate to a value collapse. Extreme fluctuations in a short period often reflect market structure issues rather than a deterioration of the asset’s fundamentals.
Fourth, risk management remains key. Setting stop-loss orders reasonably and avoiding heavy trading in unfamiliar trading pairs are crucial to reducing unexpected risks.
Overall, the event where Bitcoin briefly fell to $24,111 in the Binance BTC/USD1 trading pair resembles more of a “price illusion” triggered by liquidity mismatches and trading structure, rather than a true market crash signal. The event itself did not change the overall market pattern of Bitcoin, nor did it create a sustained impact on mainstream prices.
As the cryptocurrency market continues to evolve, new stablecoins and new trading pairs will continue to emerge, and similar structural fluctuations may be difficult to completely avoid. For investors, the key is not to panic, but to understand the market operating mechanism and maintain rational judgment in a complex environment.











