Introduction: Investment Comparison of SNIFT vs FIL
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between StarryNift (SNIFT) and Filecoin (FIL) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positions in the crypto asset landscape.
StarryNift (SNIFT): Since its launch in 2024, it has gained market recognition for its AI-powered co-creation platform that transforms virtual experiences.
Filecoin (FIL): Introduced in 2020, it has been hailed as a decentralized storage network, becoming one of the cryptocurrencies with significant global trading volume and market capitalization.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between SNIFT and FIL, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question most concerning to investors:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
SNIFT (Coin A) and FIL (Coin B) Historical Price Trends
- 2024: SNIFT reached its all-time high of $0.13 on September 26, 2024.
- 2025: FIL hit its all-time low of $0.848008 on October 11, 2025.
- Comparative analysis: In recent market cycles, SNIFT dropped from its high of $0.13 to a low of $0.0003608, while FIL declined from its all-time high of $236.84 to its current price of $1.625.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-30)
- SNIFT current price: $0.0004993
- FIL current price: $1.625
- 24-hour trading volume: SNIFT $17,359.98 vs FIL $1,229,709.02
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 28 (Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting SNIFT vs FIL Investment Value
Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)
- SNIFT: Inflationary model with token mining rewards that decrease over time
- FIL: Capped supply of 2 billion tokens with deflationary mechanisms through token burning from storage fees
- 📌 Historical pattern: Deflationary mechanisms like FIL's tend to create upward price pressure in long-term market cycles, while SNIFT's inflation rate may dilute token value unless adoption grows proportionally.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional holdings: FIL has garnered more institutional interest through Grayscale's Filecoin Trust and enterprise storage solutions
- Enterprise adoption: FIL has stronger enterprise integration through Filecoin Virtual Machine (FVM) and Web3 storage solutions, while SNIFT is still establishing its market positioning
- Regulatory attitudes: Both projects face similar regulatory scrutiny as utility tokens in the decentralized storage space
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- SNIFT technical upgrades: Focus on network scalability and node distribution mechanisms
- FIL technical development: Continuous improvement of the FVM, integration with IPFS, and implementation of proof-of-useful-work consensus
- Ecosystem comparison: FIL has a more mature ecosystem with established DeFi applications, NFT storage solutions, and enterprise integrations, while SNIFT's ecosystem is still in earlier development stages
Macroeconomic Environment and Market Cycles
- Inflation performance: Storage-based tokens like FIL and SNIFT potentially offer hedge characteristics against inflation as digital storage remains in demand regardless of economic conditions
- Monetary policy impacts: Both tokens show sensitivity to broader crypto market movements driven by interest rates and dollar strength
- Geopolitical factors: Increasing data sovereignty concerns globally may boost demand for decentralized storage solutions represented by both tokens
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: SNIFT vs FIL
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- SNIFT: Conservative $0.000328878 - $0.0004983 | Optimistic $0.0004983 - $0.000538164
- FIL: Conservative $1.39062 - $1.617 | Optimistic $1.617 - $1.97274
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- SNIFT may enter a growth phase, with prices expected between $0.000347733672 and $0.00065556348
- FIL may enter a bullish market, with prices expected between $1.7653443885 and $3.020227749
- Key drivers: Institutional investment inflow, ETF developments, ecosystem growth
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- SNIFT: Base scenario $0.00078194471784 - $0.001126000393689 | Optimistic scenario $0.001126000393689+
- FIL: Base scenario $3.398340589156012 - $3.772158053963173 | Optimistic scenario $3.772158053963173+
View detailed price predictions for SNIFT and FIL
Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and market projections. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. This information should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
SNIFT:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.000538164 |
0.0004983 |
0.000328878 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.0006218784 |
0.000518232 |
0.00027466296 |
3 |
| 2027 |
0.00065556348 |
0.0005700552 |
0.000347733672 |
14 |
| 2028 |
0.0008089083288 |
0.00061280934 |
0.0005760407796 |
22 |
| 2029 |
0.00085303060128 |
0.0007108588344 |
0.00060423000924 |
42 |
| 2030 |
0.001126000393689 |
0.00078194471784 |
0.000445708489168 |
56 |
FIL:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
1.97274 |
1.617 |
1.39062 |
0 |
| 2026 |
2.4589719 |
1.79487 |
1.6692291 |
10 |
| 2027 |
3.020227749 |
2.12692095 |
1.7653443885 |
30 |
| 2028 |
3.577268345805 |
2.5735743495 |
1.49267312271 |
58 |
| 2029 |
3.721259830659525 |
3.0754213476525 |
2.983158707222925 |
89 |
| 2030 |
3.772158053963173 |
3.398340589156012 |
3.262406965589772 |
109 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: SNIFT vs FIL
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- SNIFT: Suitable for investors focused on AI-powered co-creation platforms and virtual experiences
- FIL: Suitable for investors interested in decentralized storage solutions and Web3 infrastructure
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: SNIFT 20% vs FIL 80%
- Aggressive investors: SNIFT 40% vs FIL 60%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risks
- SNIFT: Higher volatility due to lower market cap and trading volume
- FIL: Susceptibility to broader cryptocurrency market trends and competition in the decentralized storage space
Technical Risks
- SNIFT: Scalability, network stability
- FIL: Mining power concentration, security vulnerabilities
Regulatory Risks
- Global regulatory policies may have different impacts on both tokens, with FIL potentially facing more scrutiny due to its larger market presence
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- SNIFT advantages: Emerging AI-powered co-creation platform, potential for rapid growth in virtual experiences sector
- FIL advantages: Established decentralized storage network, strong institutional adoption, mature ecosystem
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a small allocation to FIL as part of a diversified cryptocurrency portfolio
- Experienced investors: Balanced approach with both SNIFT and FIL, adjusting based on risk tolerance and market conditions
- Institutional investors: Focus on FIL for its established infrastructure and potential integration with enterprise storage solutions
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between SNIFT and FIL?
A: SNIFT is an AI-powered co-creation platform for virtual experiences launched in 2024, while FIL is a decentralized storage network introduced in 2020. FIL has a larger market cap, higher trading volume, and a more established ecosystem, whereas SNIFT is newer with potential for growth in the AI and virtual experience sectors.
Q2: Which token has performed better historically?
A: FIL has shown more significant price movements, reaching an all-time high of $236.84, compared to SNIFT's all-time high of $0.13. However, both have experienced substantial declines from their peaks, with FIL currently trading at $1.625 and SNIFT at $0.0004993 as of November 30, 2025.
Q3: How do the supply mechanisms differ between SNIFT and FIL?
A: SNIFT uses an inflationary model with decreasing token mining rewards over time. FIL has a capped supply of 2 billion tokens and implements deflationary mechanisms through token burning from storage fees.
Q4: Which token has greater institutional adoption?
A: FIL has garnered more institutional interest, with products like Grayscale's Filecoin Trust and stronger enterprise integration through the Filecoin Virtual Machine (FVM) and Web3 storage solutions. SNIFT is still establishing its market position.
Q5: What are the key factors affecting the future value of these tokens?
A: Key factors include technological development, ecosystem growth, institutional adoption, regulatory environment, and overall market conditions. FIL's established infrastructure and enterprise solutions may provide an advantage, while SNIFT's focus on AI and virtual experiences could offer growth potential in emerging markets.
Q6: How should investors approach allocating between SNIFT and FIL?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 20% to SNIFT and 80% to FIL, while more aggressive investors could opt for a 40% SNIFT and 60% FIL split. The exact allocation should be based on individual risk tolerance and market analysis.
Q7: What are the potential risks associated with investing in SNIFT and FIL?
A: Both tokens face market risks such as volatility and regulatory uncertainties. SNIFT may have higher volatility due to its lower market cap and trading volume. FIL faces risks related to mining power concentration and competition in the decentralized storage space. Technical risks include scalability issues for SNIFT and potential security vulnerabilities for FIL.