Is the U.S. really going to use Bitcoin to solve the national debt problem? The international community is not buying it!

Recent analyses have pointed out that the United States once considered using cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin to tackle the pressure of $36 trillion in national debt, but this idea did not receive positive responses from major economies. Market observers indicate that there are widespread concerns among countries regarding the volatility and regulatory risks of cryptocurrencies, leading to obstacles in advancing this plan.

Bitcoin is questioned by some viewpoints for its speculative attributes due to its fixed total supply but infinite divisibility. Supporters believe its technological advantages are significant, while critics point out the extreme price volatility and higher risks of market manipulation. Public data shows that the scale of Bitcoin held in the United States is about $12 billion, which is significantly lower compared to the massive national debt. To completely cover the debt with Bitcoin, its price would need to increase several times over, and this assumption currently lacks a realistic basis.

At the policy level, there are differences among multiple countries regarding the positioning of Bitcoin. For instance, some European countries recognize its currency attributes, while economies like China explicitly define it as a virtual commodity, restricting its circulation within the financial system. This regulatory divergence further undermines the feasibility of Bitcoin as an international debt resolution solution.

Market analysts point out that the high liquidity risk of Bitcoin fundamentally contradicts the demand for the stability of U.S. Treasuries. Although decentralized finance (DeFi) technology provides new pathways for asset trading, traditional financial institutions still tend to manage risks through mature tools such as gold and foreign exchange reserves. Furthermore, if the U.S. forcibly promotes the linkage of Bitcoin with government bonds, it may trigger further doubts in the market regarding the credit of the U.S. dollar, and even accelerate the reconstruction of the international monetary system.

For ordinary investors, the dramatic fluctuations in the cryptocurrency market remain a significant challenge. Historical cases show that unregulated markets are prone to becoming speculative tools, with retail investors often at a disadvantage due to information asymmetry.

In summary, Bitcoin currently does not have the conditions to replace traditional debt repayment methods. The cautious attitude of the international community reflects deep concerns about the combination of new financial instruments and sovereign debt. In the future, the United States may need to address debt challenges through fiscal reform and multilateral cooperation, rather than relying on a single asset speculation.
#BTC ETF可作为贷款抵押品 #贝莱德买入5.6亿美元ETH #六月行情预测