🐚

Yarm sent out that document tonight, everyone should have seen it. I went to find some information in plain language to help everyone understand better.
⬇️

💗
Core Mechanism Architecture:
Yarm operates through three key participants in triangular value exchange:

Yappers ( creators ), LPs ( liquidity providers ), project parties

The above result
⬆️
You see, leveraging mouth-to-mouth and attracting funds is the main part, which I think is a more suitable way.

🏝️
mechanism design
Overlapping Score (OS) represents Yarm's core innovation - measuring the percentage of overlap between the top 1,000 Yappers of a project and existing Yarm community members.

Dynamic APY Structure

This creates a powerful feedback loop: higher participation → higher OS → higher APY → more deposits → greater creator rewards. The more you participate and attract deposits, the more creator rewards you have.

🌊
Gameplay Process: Step-by-Step Mechanism

1️⃣
Content Score: Creators publish content on X; Kaito AI evaluates each account's contribution to the mental share.

2️⃣
Liquidity pool launch: The project party launches the capped "Yarms" and presets parameters.
Allocation Distribution: The highest-rated Yappers receive priority allocation links.

3️⃣
Funding routing: LPs make deposits through specific Yapper allocations.

4️⃣
Reward Distribution: The fund pool generates profits; Yappers earn a Carry % from the capital flow they facilitate.

5️⃣
Continuous optimization: OS real-time tracking, dynamic adjustment of APY levels

🦈
Economic model analysis: both good and bad.
Benefits:

1️⃣
For creators: Transforming intangible influence into verifiable on-chain revenue streams.

2️⃣
For LPs: Provide "socially curated trading flows" and optimize earnings driven by engagement.

3️⃣
For project parties: Alternative liquidity guidance, embedded in narrative development.

Disadvantages:

4️⃣
Yappers: Earn Carry rewards with zero capital risk

5️⃣
LPs: bear all downside risks while relying on the quality of creator participation

6️⃣
Project party: Liquidity depends on the platform, with potential risks of narrative manipulation.

Summary:
Overall, I might give Yarm's narrative a score of 7 out of 10.
✨