1. Background: In September 2025, MSCI, one of the world’s most influential index providers, launched a formal consultation on how to classify “digital-asset treasury companies” (DATs) such as MicroStrategy (MSTR, recently rebranded as Strategy in some disclosures).
The central question: Should companies whose core activity is holding Bitcoin be treated like investment funds/trusts instead of operating companies?
Under MSCI’s proposal, a company may be reclassified as a DAT if: - 50% or more of its total assets consist of digital assets, and - those assets represent its primary business activity.
If reclassified as an investment fund-like entity, the company would no longer qualify for major equity benchmarks such as: - MSCI USA - MSCI ACWI / World - Other regional and thematic indexes
This is a major issue for MicroStrategy because: - It holds 649,870 BTC, worth ≈ $55B at ~$85k/BTC. - Bitcoin accounts for over 75% of its total assets — well beyond MSCI’s threshold.
2. Timeline: What Happens Next - Consultation end: December 31, 2025 - Decision announcement: January 15, 2026 - Index changes take effect: February 2026
The outcome is not finalized, but the anticipation alone has already triggered market volatility, amplified by a broader crypto downturn (Bitcoin –32% YTD).
3. MicroStrategy’s Response Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman, has strongly opposed the proposal, insisting that MSTR is: - an active operating company, - building a Bitcoin-based structured finance ecosystem, - not a passive fund or trust.
To reinforce this narrative, the company raised $7.7B in 2025 through instruments like $STRK and $STRC to continue acquiring BTC, highlighting its hybrid identity as both a software company and a Bitcoin financial platform.
4. Key Market Impact: Forced Selling Risk If MSCI ultimately reclassifies MicroStrategy as a DAT, the market impact could be dramatic due to mechanical, non-discretionary selling by passive investors.
Approximate exposure: - MSTR’s enterprise value: ~$66B - Held by index-tracking funds (MSCI, Nasdaq 100 replications, etc.): ~$9B
If MSTR is removed from major indexes: - These funds would be obligated to sell, - Not due to fundamentals, but index rules. - This could spark meaningful downward pressure on the stock.
This scenario partly explains the ongoing selloff and heightened volatility.
5. Broader Implications for Crypto This situation highlights a deeper tension: Traditional index methodologies vs. Bitcoin-centric corporate models.
Passive investing has grown to ~$100 trillion globally, and index providers strongly favor businesses with: - diversified revenue streams - stable operating activities - low asset concentration
MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin strategy blurs the boundaries between: - operating company - asset manager - BTC holding vehicle
If MSCI moves ahead, similar companies may be structurally excluded from mainstream equity benchmarks.
7. What to Watch Next The key catalyst is MSCI’s announcement on January 15, 2026.
Given the scale of passive assets tied to MSCI benchmarks, this ruling has the potential to cause: - short-term dislocations in MSTR, - spillovers into Bitcoin sentiment, - and renewed debate on how corporates integrate digital assets on balance sheets.
Stay alert to MSCI updates, the decision could define early-2026 market dynamics.
TL;DR: MSCI is considering reclassifying MicroStrategy as a digital-asset treasury company because >75% of its assets are Bitcoin. If approved, MSTR would be kicked out of major MSCI indexes, forcing ~$9B of passive funds to sell. The decision lands January 15, 2026.
The threat of mechanical, non-fundamental selling is fueling the current MSTR drop and adding pressure to Bitcoin’s broader selloff (already –32% YTD). Saylor is fighting back, arguing MSTR is an operating company building Bitcoin-backed structured finance, not a fund.
If MSCI follows through, February 2026 could see major flows reshuffling. Until then: high volatility.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
$BTC Selloff: Why MSCI’s Consultation Matters
1. Background:
In September 2025, MSCI, one of the world’s most influential index providers, launched a formal consultation on how to classify “digital-asset treasury companies” (DATs) such as MicroStrategy (MSTR, recently rebranded as Strategy in some disclosures).
The central question:
Should companies whose core activity is holding Bitcoin be treated like investment funds/trusts instead of operating companies?
Under MSCI’s proposal, a company may be reclassified as a DAT if:
- 50% or more of its total assets consist of digital assets, and
- those assets represent its primary business activity.
If reclassified as an investment fund-like entity, the company would no longer qualify for major equity benchmarks such as:
- MSCI USA
- MSCI ACWI / World
- Other regional and thematic indexes
This is a major issue for MicroStrategy because:
- It holds 649,870 BTC, worth ≈ $55B at ~$85k/BTC.
- Bitcoin accounts for over 75% of its total assets — well beyond MSCI’s threshold.
2. Timeline: What Happens Next
- Consultation end: December 31, 2025
- Decision announcement: January 15, 2026
- Index changes take effect: February 2026
The outcome is not finalized, but the anticipation alone has already triggered market volatility, amplified by a broader crypto downturn (Bitcoin –32% YTD).
3. MicroStrategy’s Response
Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman, has strongly opposed the proposal, insisting that MSTR is:
- an active operating company,
- building a Bitcoin-based structured finance ecosystem,
- not a passive fund or trust.
To reinforce this narrative, the company raised $7.7B in 2025 through instruments like $STRK and $STRC to continue acquiring BTC, highlighting its hybrid identity as both a software company and a Bitcoin financial platform.
4. Key Market Impact: Forced Selling Risk
If MSCI ultimately reclassifies MicroStrategy as a DAT, the market impact could be dramatic due to mechanical, non-discretionary selling by passive investors.
Approximate exposure:
- MSTR’s enterprise value: ~$66B
- Held by index-tracking funds (MSCI, Nasdaq 100 replications, etc.): ~$9B
If MSTR is removed from major indexes:
- These funds would be obligated to sell,
- Not due to fundamentals, but index rules.
- This could spark meaningful downward pressure on the stock.
This scenario partly explains the ongoing selloff and heightened volatility.
5. Broader Implications for Crypto
This situation highlights a deeper tension:
Traditional index methodologies vs. Bitcoin-centric corporate models.
Passive investing has grown to ~$100 trillion globally, and index providers strongly favor businesses with:
- diversified revenue streams
- stable operating activities
- low asset concentration
MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin strategy blurs the boundaries between:
- operating company
- asset manager
- BTC holding vehicle
If MSCI moves ahead, similar companies may be structurally excluded from mainstream equity benchmarks.
7. What to Watch Next
The key catalyst is MSCI’s announcement on January 15, 2026.
Given the scale of passive assets tied to MSCI benchmarks, this ruling has the potential to cause:
- short-term dislocations in MSTR,
- spillovers into Bitcoin sentiment,
- and renewed debate on how corporates integrate digital assets on balance sheets.
Stay alert to MSCI updates, the decision could define early-2026 market dynamics.
TL;DR:
MSCI is considering reclassifying MicroStrategy as a digital-asset treasury company because >75% of its assets are Bitcoin. If approved, MSTR would be kicked out of major MSCI indexes, forcing ~$9B of passive funds to sell. The decision lands January 15, 2026.
The threat of mechanical, non-fundamental selling is fueling the current MSTR drop and adding pressure to Bitcoin’s broader selloff (already –32% YTD). Saylor is fighting back, arguing MSTR is an operating company building Bitcoin-backed structured finance, not a fund.
If MSCI follows through, February 2026 could see major flows reshuffling. Until then: high volatility.