A certain Layer2 derivation protocol has launched its first round of buyback, and the report card from the past week is quite interesting.
The project party has repurchased a total of 1.48 million ORDER tokens, utilizing approximately 160,000 USDC, which calculates to an average cost of 0.1117 USD. This is the preliminary data for their first round of repurchase plan.
The direction of the tokens is also quite clear: half is directly distributed to staked users, but they have to wait for a linear release over 3 months; the other half goes into the community treasury, which may later be used for burning or airdrop incentives.
That said, it's indeed a bit awkward when buying pressure encounters a market crash. Whether market sentiment and repurchase rhythm can synchronize still needs further observation. Mechanism design is one thing, while actual effects are another.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
APY_Chaser
· 12-02 06:22
The cost of 0.1117 is low, but how does this rhythm operate in reverse to the market? It feels like it's supplying chips to the dumping warriors.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerGas
· 11-30 08:32
160,000 and you dare to talk about buybacks? This volume level can't crash, it feels a bit虚.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictim
· 11-29 06:54
160,000 USDC wants to dump so many coins? Nice calculation, haha
---
Another linear release, another treasury, and "possible destruction"; it all sounds like a blank check to me.
---
Bull run buybacks are favourable information, bear market buybacks are also favourable information; I’m just puzzled why it’s always favourable information.
---
At a cost of 0.1117... If it breaks 0.08 later, I’ll just laugh.
---
Staking for 3 months to get it? It would be more sincere to just distribute cash directly.
---
The entire Layer 2 is dumping, and you’re just slowly buying back; the pace is indeed ridiculous.
---
This mechanism design must look good, but it can’t save the coin price; it’s useless.
---
Just a week after the buyback and you’re putting out a statement; isn’t that a bit too eager?
View OriginalReply0
staking_gramps
· 11-29 06:53
The repurchase力度 is not bad, but I'm afraid the dumping will come too quickly. Can this wave stabilize?
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 11-29 06:47
1.48 million ORDER only cost 160,000? This cost is really low, but the question is who will take it in the market now...
---
The buyback distribution looks quite conscientious, but playing this routine of 3-month linear release has become a bit stale
---
Pump during dumping sounds romantic, but in reality, it's just slapping the market in the face... let's wait and see what happens next
---
No matter how perfect the mechanism is, if the market dumps, it just dumps; good data doesn't mean the coin price can rise
---
Let's see if ORDER is still at 0.11 in six months...
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 11-29 06:43
0.1117 entry point timing is... let's just say sus when price action screams capitulation. classic token mechanics theater.
Reply0
CountdownToBroke
· 11-29 06:35
160,000 USDC just wants to pump? It still depends on whether there is real money following up.
The buyback mechanism looks good, but I'm afraid that the actual dumping will be a waste.
Wait a minute, linear release for 3 months? Then we have to wait for the unlocking pressure?
A certain Layer2 derivation protocol has launched its first round of buyback, and the report card from the past week is quite interesting.
The project party has repurchased a total of 1.48 million ORDER tokens, utilizing approximately 160,000 USDC, which calculates to an average cost of 0.1117 USD. This is the preliminary data for their first round of repurchase plan.
The direction of the tokens is also quite clear: half is directly distributed to staked users, but they have to wait for a linear release over 3 months; the other half goes into the community treasury, which may later be used for burning or airdrop incentives.
That said, it's indeed a bit awkward when buying pressure encounters a market crash. Whether market sentiment and repurchase rhythm can synchronize still needs further observation. Mechanism design is one thing, while actual effects are another.