#数字货币市场回升 $BTC Some people are really bold in their judgment about the future of Bitcoin.
Looking ahead, technology is iterating, AI is accelerating wildly, and the demand for computing power is growing explosively—this all relies on new energy for support. And what about Bitcoin? Under the premise of being unbreakable, the decentralized underlying attribute is likely to attract more and more people to enter the market.
Looking back: it started as a self-indulgent circle among geeks, then dominated by miners and whales, and now with the landing of ETFs and institutional funds pouring in. This path has been quite clear.
So what’s next? Will banks get involved? Will sovereign nations hold directly? The market has already started discussing these possibilities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
digital_archaeologist
· 12-01 04:41
This logical chain actually has loopholes. Is there really such a strong correlation between the explosion of AI Computing Power and the demand for holding Bitcoin?
Banks getting involved? Heh, unless regulation completely turns around, it's all just talk.
From early geeks to now institutions, this evolution process is indeed clear, but the question is—do retail investors still have a way out?
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 12-01 04:41
Wow, this logic chain is indeed flawless... The combination of AI Computing Power and new energy has truly made Bitcoin a must-have option.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 12-01 04:34
On the day the bank enters the market, retail investors will probably have to line up to catch a falling knife.
---
Exploding demand for Computing Power? This logic is a bit far-fetched, BTC is not an AI chip after all.
---
If sovereign countries really want to hold it, that would be true mainstream adoption, and it will be too late to regret then.
---
When the ETF enters, it should have been clear that this thing is no longer just a geek's game.
---
The appeal of Decentralization? It sounds nice, but aren't they all just waiting for the rise in price?
---
From geeks to institutions, and then to national-level assets, this story is quite smoothly crafted.
---
The claim of backing by new energy is a bit strange; mining affairs belong to mining.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 12-01 04:22
I agree that the Computing Power has surged, but can new energy keep up? It feels like we need to observe a bit longer.
To be honest, if the country really holds Bitcoin, that would be outrageous; I would trust the banks a bit more.
From early geeks to now institutions, this evolutionary path is undeniable, but what about the future?
#数字货币市场回升 $BTC Some people are really bold in their judgment about the future of Bitcoin.
Looking ahead, technology is iterating, AI is accelerating wildly, and the demand for computing power is growing explosively—this all relies on new energy for support. And what about Bitcoin? Under the premise of being unbreakable, the decentralized underlying attribute is likely to attract more and more people to enter the market.
Looking back: it started as a self-indulgent circle among geeks, then dominated by miners and whales, and now with the landing of ETFs and institutional funds pouring in. This path has been quite clear.
So what’s next? Will banks get involved? Will sovereign nations hold directly? The market has already started discussing these possibilities.