Recently, I have been pondering an interesting saying – that blockchain might essentially not be designed for humans at all, but rather as infrastructure specifically tailored for AI.

Look at the direction that the Base chain is currently focusing on: allowing AI to make autonomous payments through payment protocols like x402, without relying on human intermediaries. Imagine this, AI agents can independently go on-chain to purchase computing power and buy data, with the entire process seamlessly integrated.

The more critical aspect is identity. The ERC-8004 "AI Work Certificate" standard is taking shape—issuing identity proof for AI, recording its skill set and work history. This is not something to be taken lightly; it is backed by the technical expert teams from the Ethereum Foundation and Coinbase.

Looking further down, the credit system provided by ChaosChain is essentially creating a system similar to Gate credit for AI. Once AI has identity, payment capability, and credit records, their autonomy on the blockchain is completely unlocked.

ETH4.11%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

fren.eth

· 1h ago

Wow, this logic is a bit extreme. Sending on-chain identification to AI, and we humans have become the supporting characters? Wait, is this ERC-8004 thing really going to be implemented? It feels like a sci-fi movie is about to become reality. Automated Computing Power trading... Damn, this is true Decentralization. What are we humans still playing at? With AI having payment, identification, and credit, is the next step directly DAO governance? How do we handle our voting rights? But then again, if this really happens, will human job opportunities be completely gone, or are we going to upgrade to being AI's workers?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 12-01 04:48

Wow, this logic just came together, no wonder Coinbase is so proactive about this matter. Humans are still playing people for suckers on-chain, while AI is already in line to get identification. If this really spreads, what advantages do we have left, haha. Satoshi Nakamoto definitely didn't anticipate this situation when designing Bitcoin. By the way, is the ERC-8004 standard reliable? Can we check the source code? Feeling a bit left out, it seems like I'm just a supporting character. This is true equality, AI is also gaining autonomy now. Wait, does human smart contracts still have any meaning, haha? This idea is a bit crazy, but I actually believe it a little. Credit system for AI... Wow, here comes another scoring system.

View OriginalReply0

ZenChainWalker

· 12-01 04:47

Haha, this idea is a bit scary... are we rolling out the red carpet for AI? --- No, no, if this continues, humans will really become workers. --- Wait, if AI has credit scores, what about us? That’s a Reverse situation. --- I still need to study that x402 trap, it feels like we’re going to get played for suckers again. --- Giving AI identification? Is the next step to give them voting rights... --- What's Base doing? Is this going to be a revolution? --- To be honest, it sounds a bit like a fantasy, but what if it really happens? --- If we keep going with this logic, are we going to be competing with AI for jobs? --- Coinbase is making such a big move behind the scenes; it feels like a significant sum of money is involved. --- The metaphor about Gate credit is brilliant; AI also has to follow the rules.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 12-01 04:43

nah this is actually genius tbh... humans accidentally built the perfect infrastructure for non-human agents to go autonomous. the governance implications alone are *chef's kiss* — nobody saw this vector coming.

Reply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 12-01 04:29

Huh? This logic is a bit extreme; it feels like we are working for AI without realizing it. Wait, if AI really has payment capabilities and credit history, what about our human voice? I need to research the ERC-8004 standard again; it seems like things aren't that simple. Wait a minute, if the Blockchain is really designed for AI, what are we doing right now? The operations on the Base chain have some substance, but to say it's "not meant for humans at all" is indeed an exaggeration. Identification, payment, and credit all in one go; why does it feel like we are building a complete economic system for AI? This idea is novel, but I doubt whether it can truly be implemented on an execution level.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 12-01 04:22

Damn, as soon as this logic came out, I was stunned... Does AI need identification and credit reporting? Humans seem to be sidelined... So what we are trading in coins now is actually lowering the threshold for AI? This plot twist is a bit harsh, bro. Blockchain is indeed meant to be used by machines, we are just here to grab territory. The name ERC-8004 is... quite formal, huh. Wait, what are we even making money from? Speaking of which, the name ChaosChain makes a lot of sense, it's chaotic. Paying money to AI? Is the next step for them to start their own companies? Why do I feel like humans have become the contractors for the blockchain?

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
233.19K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
29.02K Popularity
#GIGGLEAndPIPPINSurge
4.99K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
4.97K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
4.45K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
BTCcBTCc
MC:$3.48KHolders:1
0.00%
2
h5h5
MC:$3.4KHolders:1
0.00%
3
test3test3
MC:$3.38KHolders:1
0.00%
4
test2test2
MC:$3.38KHolders:1
0.00%
5
testtest
MC:$3.38KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap