Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

David Sacks, the White House's Crypto Assets and AI Policy Director, recently went on the offensive on social media, directly attacking The New York Times.



The matter dates back to five months ago. According to Sacks himself, the established media outlet was attempting to fabricate an in-depth report about his "conflict of interest." The reporter threw out a bunch of accusations - such as dining privately with tech moguls, promising to facilitate connections with the president, and even meddling in defense contracts.

Sacks's approach is very hardcore: he refutes each accusation one by one, pushing back against every charge. And the result? Every time he knocks down one, the reporters just switch to a new angle to continue picking at him, like whack-a-mole.

Finally, Sacks openly stated: "The New York Times has long stopped doing objective reporting." He is not just talking; he has already hired the Clare Locke law firm, which specializes in media lawsuits, to handle this matter.

Looking at this situation, it seems that this war of words is far from over.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
down_only_larryvip
· 8h ago
I'm tired of this trap; it's always the same routine.
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeekvip
· 8h ago
The New York Times' trap is too lame, and the whack-a-mole style questioning is ridiculous. If Sacks really goes for it this time, let's see who laughs last.
View OriginalReply0
MoonWaterDropletsvip
· 9h ago
The New York Times' trap is really incredible, the whack-a-mole style questioning is truly ridiculous haha
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippavip
· 9h ago
Ha, this is the old trap of traditional media, if they can't argue against you, they just change tactics and continue to argue.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinTherapistvip
· 9h ago
The New York Times' trap is too old, it's like playing whack-a-mole looking for black spots, no wonder fewer and fewer people believe it.
View OriginalReply0
Blockblindvip
· 9h ago
The trap of New Times is becoming more and more obvious, biting whoever they catch, and they still have to rely on lawyers.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrapevip
· 9h ago
If only I could have the resources of a pro to take on the New York Times, but for now, I can only sulk here and envy others' hot topics...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)