Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Recently, I've been keeping an eye on the LaunchOnSoar project, which is still in the early stages. It's another one that does ICM launch pads. To be honest, I've encountered too many pitfalls in this track and I'm afraid of being played people for suckers. However, looking at it this time, I feel that the team is relatively reliable, at least in form, it’s much more legitimate than those previous scams.



The water is too deep on this launch pad, especially for the ICM model; there have been many who have run away or manipulated the market. However, the current structure and mechanism design of LaunchOnSoar looks decent, and I haven't found any obvious red flags for now. Of course, early project risks are definitely present, so continuous observation is necessary.

Has anyone done research on this? Or does anyone have experience with the ICM launch platform? I just want to hear different opinions, so I don't end up diving in headfirst and being played people for suckers.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasWranglervip
· 7h ago
honestly another launchpad? at this point you're just optimizing for maximum capital inefficiency. technically speaking, if you analyze the data on failed icm projects, the pattern is demonstrably predictable—poorly designed tokenomics + inadequate vesting schedules = rug city. but sure, keep "observing" while they drain liquidity. smh
Reply0
OnlyOnMainnetvip
· 7h ago
The launchpad is really a lot of thunder, how reliable can LaunchOnSoar be? It's another one of those projects that looks legitimate but is actually just a rebranding, the early risks are simply unbearable. Is the team reliable? The definition of "reliable" in the web3 space changes every day. I've seen too many variations of the ICM model, and this time I really don't want to be Clip Coupons again. Has anyone followed up on this, or is it more rational to continue observing?
View OriginalReply0
potentially_notablevip
· 7h ago
This track is really bumpy, and I have been played people for suckers more than once. I took a glance at LaunchOnSoar, and it does look a bit better than those three-no projects in form, but in the early stages... who knows. The key still lies in the team's background and the financing parties; these two aspects usually have high transparency and generally don't differ too much. Has anyone followed up on this? I would like to hear actual feedback. Wait, is anyone still playing the ICM model? I'm not sure if we can trust Machine Capital this time; let's wait and see. As for the launchpad, I try to avoid it whenever I can; it's too easy to step on a mine. It feels like another standard "formal appearance, unknown risk"; I actually want to see how the white paper and contract code look. Better to miss out than to be played people for suckers again; being cautious this time is not a bad idea.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)