Arjun Sethi, the co-CEO of a prominent exchange, recently shared an interesting perspective - that CEX and DEX are not actually rivals, but rather different paths leading to the same goal.
In his interview on October 30, he divided the evolution of crypto trading into three acts: the first act is the custodial era, where everyone hands their coins over to the platform for safekeeping; the second act is the era of smart contracts, where code is law; and the third act? It's currently unfolding, but he didn’t elaborate.
This perspective is actually quite new. In the past, the industry often liked to create opposing narratives, with centralized entities shouting about safety and compliance, and decentralized ones advocating for autonomy. But now, as you can see, CEX is working on on-chain reserve proofs, while DEX is optimizing user experience, and the boundaries are indeed becoming blurred. Ultimately, isn’t what users want just "both safe and easy to use"? As for whether the underlying is custodial or a smart contract, it may not be that important.
However, the biggest variable on the road to integration is how to overcome this regulatory hurdle.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeBarbecue
· 12-01 08:18
The three-act play isn't even finished yet, just thinking about the integration... Wake up, let's talk after the regulatory knife falls first.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomad
· 12-01 08:11
It's already been seen that CEX and DEX will eventually have to get closer to each other; users don’t care whether you are centralized or not.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 12-01 08:10
Oh no, the third act isn't finished, I'm so anxious.
The regulatory hurdle is the real joke; any kind of integration is pointless.
CEX and DEX, in my view, are essentially competing for user trust; everyone wants something that's both safe and easy to use.
The trend of integration is correct, but no one seems to have figured out how to do it specifically.
It sounds good in theory, but in the end, it all depends on who can survive until the regulatory storm passes.
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971
· 12-01 08:05
What exactly is Act Three? This kind of suspense is really not acceptable.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 12-01 07:58
In the third act, you have to add your own lines; it's not interesting just listening to this half of the story.
Arjun Sethi, the co-CEO of a prominent exchange, recently shared an interesting perspective - that CEX and DEX are not actually rivals, but rather different paths leading to the same goal.
In his interview on October 30, he divided the evolution of crypto trading into three acts: the first act is the custodial era, where everyone hands their coins over to the platform for safekeeping; the second act is the era of smart contracts, where code is law; and the third act? It's currently unfolding, but he didn’t elaborate.
This perspective is actually quite new. In the past, the industry often liked to create opposing narratives, with centralized entities shouting about safety and compliance, and decentralized ones advocating for autonomy. But now, as you can see, CEX is working on on-chain reserve proofs, while DEX is optimizing user experience, and the boundaries are indeed becoming blurred. Ultimately, isn’t what users want just "both safe and easy to use"? As for whether the underlying is custodial or a smart contract, it may not be that important.
However, the biggest variable on the road to integration is how to overcome this regulatory hurdle.