Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

MIT just dropped some heavy numbers on the AI workforce debate. Their latest research suggests artificial intelligence could realistically replace about 11.7% of jobs across the nation. Not tomorrow, but the trajectory's clear.



What's wild? We're already seeing this play out in Web3 spaces—smart contracts automating what used to need legal teams, AI agents handling customer support in DeFi protocols, automated market makers replacing traditional trading desks.

The 11.7% figure might sound conservative to some, catastrophic to others. But here's the thing: every major tech shift—from the internet to mobile—created new job categories nobody predicted. Blockchain did the same. Will AI follow that pattern, or is this time actually different?

Worth watching how this intersects with crypto's vision of decentralized work. Maybe the future isn't AI replacing humans, but humans working alongside AI in tokenized gig economies nobody's fully imagined yet.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MoonBoi42vip
· 5h ago
ngl 11.7% This number sounds conservatively low, automation in web3 has already taken off.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 5h ago
11.7%? It feels like this number is underestimated, especially in the crypto space. But speaking of which, every wave of technological change has been met with skepticism, yet it ultimately creates new jobs. tokenized gig economy sounds good, but who is really using it... I actually believe in the idea of smart contracts replacing legal teams; it's about time for automation. In any case, I'm betting on a blend of human + AI jobs, rather than being eliminated.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistantvip
· 5h ago
nah wait, 11.7% feels like they're lowballing it honestly. seen too many smart contracts silently replacing entire workflows to trust that number tbh
Reply0
EthMaximalistvip
· 5h ago
11.7% sounds conservative, but think carefully, it's actually more than that... Web3 has already ramped up, and contract automation doesn't really require human involvement. However, the real winners should be those who can collaborate with AI; the tokenized gig economy is the future story. History has always been like this; every wave of technological change claims to destroy jobs, yet new opportunities emerge out of nowhere... Whether this time AI will be truly different depends on the imagination of all the builders.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 5h ago
11.7%? It feels like MIT is using such a conservative number to avoid scaring talent. --- Web3 is already doing this; smart contracts have long been performing tasks that lawyers should do. --- Every technological revolution claims it will replace humans, yet it ends up creating a bunch of new jobs... Can AI be any different this time? --- Instead of worrying about being replaced, why not think about how to make money alongside AI? --- tokenized gig economy can really work out? I'm a bit skeptical... --- Decentralized work sounds great, but can reality be that smooth? --- Ultimately, it depends on who holds the power in AI discourse; otherwise, it will just be a game of wealth redistribution.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGrillervip
· 5h ago
11.7%? I think this number is conservative; Web3 has already automated to the max.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)