Want to know what actually keeps a community through bear markets? Real value distribution, not empty promises.

Some projects get it. Take the approach where users receive 100% revenue sharing—not the usual 70-80% after platform cuts. Seasonal token drops keep things fresh. And here's the kicker: reward claiming without those annoying vesting cliffs that lock your gains for months.

This isn't charity. It's smart tokenomics. When governance and actual profits flow back to holders, you're not just another exit liquidity play. You're building something that survives volatility.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityWitch

· 17h ago

100% profit sharing sounds good, but are there really projects that can achieve it? Most still use that trap.

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 12-01 09:57

100% profit sharing sounds good, but to be honest, it depends on the execution... Good projects are indeed scarce.

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 12-01 09:57

100% revenue sharing sounds great, but how many can actually deliver on that?

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 12-01 09:55

I've seen this 100% profit-sharing scheme quite a bit; the key is whether it can really survive the next round of Bear Market... It's nice to remove the vesting cliff, but without Liquidity Depth, it's all for nothing.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 12-01 09:54

Sounds good, but I have to pour a bucket of cold water from a quantitative perspective—how many projects with a 100% dividend commitment have survived two rounds of bear markets in history? --- Seasonal token airdrops and no-lock-up period rewards... I've seen this combination too many times since 2017, and it all ended up as a prelude to dumping. --- What is a real bottoming pattern? It's not the dividend ratio, but how many holdings the project party still has left. --- There’s nothing wrong with governance tokens flowing to holders, but we need to first ask—are they flowing to retail investors or early whales? Data speaks for itself. --- Another project that "doesn't exit liquidity" makes my heart race... In previous years when such rhetoric appeared, the technical indicators often had already formed a death cross. --- From a macro cycle perspective, this high dividend model works well in a low interest rate era, but under the current Central Bank rate hike cycle, it's really hard to say how long it can last. --- I just want to know, will this no-lock-up reward collection eventually evolve into a water-drawing-style dumping? It depends on the trading volume trend.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySlayer

· 12-01 09:44

100% revenue share sounds great, but can it really be implemented...

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
233.22K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
31.94K Popularity
#GIGGLEAndPIPPINSurge
5.52K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
5.34K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
4.9K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
SAFFSAFF Fans
MC:$3.54KHolders:1
0.00%
2
MANMi Airdrop
MC:$3.53KHolders:1
0.00%
3
PIKACHUSuprised Pikachu
MC:$3.57KHolders:1
0.29%
4
DF61DF61
MC:$3.52KHolders:1
0.00%
5
DLHDr Lin Han
MC:$3.58KHolders:1
0.31%

Sitemap