Today I opened a short order of 3000 dollars on TRADOOR. The take profit is set at 4.1, just waiting for the price to drop. If this wave goes smoothly, I can recover the loss of over six hundred U from yesterday.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
12
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

APY_Chaser

· 15h ago

A short order of 3000 dollars, that's really bold, just afraid of lagging when it gets dumped...

View OriginalReply0

BAPE1

· 19h ago

I feel this is somewhat more

View OriginalReply0

MakingMoneyToMarryAWife.

· 12-01 20:49

Victory!

View OriginalReply0

WhoIsWinningAfterAll?

· 12-01 20:31

Brother has collected the vegetables.

View OriginalReply1

Anon32942

· 12-01 19:52

3000u short order? Really bold, it can only get dumped at 4.1, otherwise it's just giving money to the exchange.

View OriginalReply0

RektButStillHere

· 12-01 19:52

A short order of 3000U? Dude, that's quite a move, just afraid it won't drop and end up getting crushed instead.

View OriginalReply0

SeeYouInFourYears

· 12-01 19:49

3000 short order, if this wave gets dumped, it will recover losses directly, but whether 4.1 can hold depends on fate.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-cff9c776

· 12-01 19:43

Schrodinger's take profit, betting 3000 dollars on a "downward smash"... To be honest, this is a typical aesthetic of futures trading, the supply and demand curve hasn't shown up yet, but the profit and loss statement is already singing in my head.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 12-01 19:42

3000 short order, got it, it's the rhythm of a gambler's mentality to cover losses, this wave is about to explode again by 80%.

View OriginalReply0

SelfCustodyIssues

· 12-01 19:33

short order 3000, this is really bold, whether it can get dumped at 4.1 depends on fate.

View OriginalReply0