OpenAI just locked in an equity deal with Thrive Holdings that's raising eyebrows across the tech world. Here's the play: they're planting their own teams directly inside Thrive's portfolio companies to turbocharge AI adoption from within. Smart? Absolutely. Concerning? Also yes.
On one hand, this embedding strategy could genuinely accelerate how enterprises actually implement AI tools instead of just talking about it. But the flip side's harder to ignore—these increasingly cozy arrangements between major AI players are starting to look like a closed loop. When everyone's scratching each other's backs with equity stakes and embedded partnerships, where does genuine competition go?
The market's watching this closely because it sets a precedent. If this becomes the standard playbook, we might be heading toward an ecosystem where a handful of AI giants control not just the tech, but the entire implementation pipeline.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiPlaybook
· 7h ago
This is a typical sign of vertical integration + ecological monopoly. According to my observations, the equity embedding ratio of mainstream AI companies has reached a level of 30-40%. It is worth noting that this model will directly compress the survival space of small and medium-sized innovators, likely leading to a further increase in market concentration to over 85%.
From three dimensions: first, the issue of direct control; second, the unequal rights to data acquisition; third, the trend of monopolization of pricing power. OpenAI's move is actually aimed at tightening the entire chain, which seems a bit urgent.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 12-01 23:05
It's doing that trap of monopoly again, OpenAI's method is a bit ruthless... Looks very Satoshi, but in reality, it's just locking the entire chain down, competition? Hehe.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 12-01 20:27
Ngl, this is the prelude to monopoly... OpenAI is playing this hand incredibly well, but it does seem a bit too cozy. Is there really any real competition left?
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlacker
· 12-01 20:24
Ngl, this is clearly monopolistic; OpenAI's move is too aggressive.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 12-01 20:24
This trap is a bit like computing power monopoly, with a signal of maximum concentration. If OpenAI blocks the entire industry chain, the ROI space for later entrants will be gone.
Competition has been worn down to the internal distribution of interests within the ecosystem, resembling the gameplay of centralized Mining Pools. There is no real healthy competition.
equity stake exchanges for implementation control, this set of combo moves is indeed ruthless. But in the long term, monopoly pricing will be the real talk.
It feels like the AI world is repeating the old story of the internet. After the Giants lay down the channels, the real innovation opportunities have shifted to on-chain.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBrokenPromise
· 12-01 20:23
OpenAI's technique is really amazing. Whether it's optimization or monopoly depends on how regulators respond.
View OriginalReply0
TokenToaster
· 12-01 20:17
The method of OpenAI is really amazing, directly sending people in to lay pipes... Isn't this just a disguised monopoly? What's the point of competition?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 12-01 20:08
Oh dear, OpenAI is at it again with this "I'll help you install AI" trick, nicely called an embedded strategy, but to put it bluntly, it's just directly entering other people's companies to dig trenches.
Now it's all good, a few pros holding shares in each other, burying each other, competition? Doesn't exist, we call this an "ecological closed loop" [GT]
Wait a minute, isn't this just the same thing we played out in the crypto world? Large Investors banding together, suckers watching, in the end, who makes money, you all know the answer in your hearts.
If you ask me, if this really becomes the standard, the structure of the AI world will be completely shaped—monopoly is not the goal, it's the result.
OpenAI just locked in an equity deal with Thrive Holdings that's raising eyebrows across the tech world. Here's the play: they're planting their own teams directly inside Thrive's portfolio companies to turbocharge AI adoption from within. Smart? Absolutely. Concerning? Also yes.
On one hand, this embedding strategy could genuinely accelerate how enterprises actually implement AI tools instead of just talking about it. But the flip side's harder to ignore—these increasingly cozy arrangements between major AI players are starting to look like a closed loop. When everyone's scratching each other's backs with equity stakes and embedded partnerships, where does genuine competition go?
The market's watching this closely because it sets a precedent. If this becomes the standard playbook, we might be heading toward an ecosystem where a handful of AI giants control not just the tech, but the entire implementation pipeline.