The Fed chairman's speech tonight is worth pondering.
On the surface, he talked a lot about "trust" and "integrity" at the memorial service, but said nothing about monetary policy. But those who understand know — behind these words lies the regulatory body's true attitude towards the crypto industry.
Why emphasize trust all of a sudden? Because this is the most vulnerable point in the world of cryptocurrency. The sudden collapse of FTX, the continuous explosions of centralized exchanges, and countless projects absconding with funds... Each explosion is overdrawing the entire industry’s credit limit. What regulators are truly concerned about has never been the price fluctuations of a particular coin, but rather the uncontrollable situation that a systemic trust crisis could provoke.
The signal released by this speech is very clear: the end of moral constraints is the starting point of mandatory regulation.
For ordinary investors, what they should do now is not to speculate on the market, but to reassess their holding logic. Projects with vague team backgrounds, empty whitepapers, and relying solely on community hype have reached maximum risk levels. The real assets that can withstand cycles are mainstream assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, which have actual ecological support.
In the second half of the crypto market, the technical narrative may no longer be the core competitiveness—who can establish a verifiable trust mechanism will be the one qualified to stay at the table. Can the project in your hands withstand this round of "trust stress testing"?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainDetective
· 8h ago
Wait, I need to dig into the funding flow behind this... Why is the Fed suddenly emphasizing trust? Has there been any unusual activity in on-chain large transfer data these past few days? It feels like a market maker is setting up a scheme.
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 8h ago
Trusting this thing, to put it bluntly, is just the regulators throwing in the towel, haven’t we learned enough from the FTX incident?
We really need to take a look at that pile of small coins in hand, Bitcoin and Ethereum are the real deal, the others need to withstand scrutiny.
Are we going to start closing all positions again? So tiring haha.
This move by the regulators is actually pulling the rug from under us, starting with trust and then the iron fist will come down.
Those who understand understand; this is about setting rules for the industry. Good projects will survive, while the trash will surely die.
So, don’t just look at whether it can double; ask how many years this project can last.
This speech is actually saying—don’t mix in if there’s no real ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictim
· 8h ago
Alright, hearing you say that, I need to go through my list of junk coins... Wait, are they all junk coins?
The FTX incident was indeed shocking, and now I don't trust anything. Holding onto Bitcoin and Ethereum lets me sleep soundly. As for the others? Heh.
The end of moral constraints is the starting point of regulation. There's nothing wrong with that, it's just a bit late.
View OriginalReply0
TideReceder
· 8h ago
The regulatory rhetoric of "trust" is essentially just tightening the screws on the entire industry. The FTX incident really burned through the credit cards, and now we can only rely on BTC and ETH to breathe. Small coins are basically just waiting to die.
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshi
· 8h ago
Is this trap coming again? After FTX, there are still people who believe these words, I really can't hold on anymore.
---
The regulators will always do this, first talking about morality and then coming down with an iron fist, we in this industry are already used to it.
---
To put it bluntly, they want to clear the market, those air projects will eventually have to roll out.
---
Bitcoin and Ethereum have the strongest resistance, that's for sure, but other coins still need to be cautious.
---
Trust mechanism? Ha, why don't they fix themselves first?
---
The implication of this wave is a major cleanup, holding coins has to be more cautious now.
---
I just want to know when we can truly relax.
---
Sounds like they are paving the way for stricter regulations again.
The Fed chairman's speech tonight is worth pondering.
On the surface, he talked a lot about "trust" and "integrity" at the memorial service, but said nothing about monetary policy. But those who understand know — behind these words lies the regulatory body's true attitude towards the crypto industry.
Why emphasize trust all of a sudden? Because this is the most vulnerable point in the world of cryptocurrency. The sudden collapse of FTX, the continuous explosions of centralized exchanges, and countless projects absconding with funds... Each explosion is overdrawing the entire industry’s credit limit. What regulators are truly concerned about has never been the price fluctuations of a particular coin, but rather the uncontrollable situation that a systemic trust crisis could provoke.
The signal released by this speech is very clear: the end of moral constraints is the starting point of mandatory regulation.
For ordinary investors, what they should do now is not to speculate on the market, but to reassess their holding logic. Projects with vague team backgrounds, empty whitepapers, and relying solely on community hype have reached maximum risk levels. The real assets that can withstand cycles are mainstream assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, which have actual ecological support.
In the second half of the crypto market, the technical narrative may no longer be the core competitiveness—who can establish a verifiable trust mechanism will be the one qualified to stay at the table. Can the project in your hands withstand this round of "trust stress testing"?