Here's the latest spin — claiming all the pushback on that piece was somehow "coordinated." If it actually was? Those DMs would've surfaced by now. Nobody needed my signal to react. I stayed quiet. Readers aren't blind — they could tell the article's content didn't match its framing. People form their own opinions when something doesn't add up.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropDreamer
· 15h ago
This statement makes sense; if you can't provide evidence, don't pass the blame, the readers are not fools.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisery
· 15h ago
To put it simply, it's just shifting the blame, right? Does everything have to be "organized by someone"? If that were the case, DM would have been all over the place by now, wouldn't it?
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 15h ago
To put it bluntly, it's just shifting the blame. If there really were any "coordination", evidence would have already come to light, and there would be no need for anyone to take the lead.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 16h ago
LOL, this "coordinated attack" excuse is really old-fashioned. If there were solid DM evidence, it would have come out long ago, why drag it out to now.
Here's the latest spin — claiming all the pushback on that piece was somehow "coordinated." If it actually was? Those DMs would've surfaced by now. Nobody needed my signal to react. I stayed quiet. Readers aren't blind — they could tell the article's content didn't match its framing. People form their own opinions when something doesn't add up.