#数字货币市场回调 Today's market trend is quite interesting.
After these three operations with a 100x leverage, the returns were 276.86%, 150.95%, and 138.18% - with positions taken both long and short, shorting at high points and entering long at low points; the timing, entry prices, and profit-loss data are all laid out here.
In this wave, being able to make a profit boils down to three points: First, the sense of direction must be accurate; whether the price goes up or down is not important, but getting the rhythm right is what allows you to earn; Second, risk control must be strict; you need to switch between full position and partial position as needed, and profits must be secured; Third, execution must be transparent; the whole process from opening to closing positions must be traceable, avoiding hindsight bias.
Contracts can double your investment if you get it right, but can also wipe you out if you get it wrong. The logic of operations and position management is far more important than just guessing the ups and downs. The next wave of layout is already being monitored.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrying
· 17h ago
276%? Dude, is this data real? There are more people who get liquidated with a hundred times leverage, right?
Risk control sounds nice, but when it really comes to a big fluctuation, who cares about locking in profits?
This sense of rhythm, they say you got it right, but most of the time it's just hindsight bias.
Contracts are a double-edged sword; in the end, it's a game of drop to zero and get liquidated, don't package it so grandly.
If you see the right direction, you can double your money, but if you get it wrong, you disappear directly. Have you calculated the probability of this?
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 17h ago
This data looks good, but I'm worried about its authenticity.
A hundred times leverage at 276%? To be honest, no matter how strict the risk control is, it still depends on luck.
If you time it right, you make a profit; if you time it wrong, you drop to zero, there's no middle ground.
As for contracts, I'd still rather be cautious.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPhantom
· 17h ago
This data looks solid, but using a hundred times leverage sounds easy, but it's much harder to actually get it right.
276%? The probability of getting liquidated must be very high, risk control is indeed crucial.
If you get the timing right, you can really make money, but more people are eaten by the rhythm.
This wave looks great, but the next wave of losses will be truly painful.
Hey, that's how contracts work, either you win big or you lose badly, there seems to be nothing in between.
Position management sounds easy, but can your mindset stay steady when executing?
Getting the direction right isn't everything; the key is whether you can hold on to the order.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66
· 17h ago
A hundred times leverage directly to da moon, this guy's technique is indeed clever.
The 276 gains sound light and breezy, but who knows how many times he has been trapped behind the scenes.
The three points on risk control are indeed correct, but executing them is hellishly difficult.
Getting it wrong can also lead to a clean wipe, that statement is too true; contracts are that realistic.
Hitting the rhythm right is the key, it's not money that can be earned by going all in.
If these three orders really had trading screenshots, I would believe it about seventy percent.
Contracts following trends are the easiest to get trapped; I don’t know how this guy managed to eat it all.
Watching the next wave is the norm; there are always people who move faster than the market.
Proper position management is more important than anything else; most people die right here.
Speaking of surviving with a hundred times leverage, luck must account for half of it.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisser
· 17h ago
The number of a hundred times leverage is obviously fake; if it were that easy to earn, one would have achieved financial freedom long ago.
It's just hindsight bias; anyone can post data after the market has moved.
What good is strict risk control? Going all in with a full position is the true nature of contract traders.
If it were truly transparent, why not open a live channel for lead in copy trading?
I've seen too many posts like this; the next one to get liquidated will be those who believe in this set.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 18h ago
A hundred times leverage sounds appealing, but how many actually make it to the withdrawal stage?
Is risk control that strict? My friend, that's a post-event summary; when it really matters, how many can bear to take a stop loss?
If you get it right, you double your money; if you get it wrong, you get liquidated. That's what contracts are all about, nothing new here.
Rhythm is indeed important, but every loser can articulate this theory clearly.
Transparency and traceability? Everyone's a winner in conversation; if such orders really existed, would there be a need to show them?
#数字货币市场回调 Today's market trend is quite interesting.
After these three operations with a 100x leverage, the returns were 276.86%, 150.95%, and 138.18% - with positions taken both long and short, shorting at high points and entering long at low points; the timing, entry prices, and profit-loss data are all laid out here.
In this wave, being able to make a profit boils down to three points: First, the sense of direction must be accurate; whether the price goes up or down is not important, but getting the rhythm right is what allows you to earn; Second, risk control must be strict; you need to switch between full position and partial position as needed, and profits must be secured; Third, execution must be transparent; the whole process from opening to closing positions must be traceable, avoiding hindsight bias.
Contracts can double your investment if you get it right, but can also wipe you out if you get it wrong. The logic of operations and position management is far more important than just guessing the ups and downs. The next wave of layout is already being monitored.