Sure, there's plenty of doubt floating around—past letdowns and false alarms have made everyone gun-shy. But here's the thing: even I can spot AI-generated text just by eyeballing the statistical quirks. So why wouldn't a trained model crush this task? Logically, these systems should be miles ahead of humans at pattern recognition. They're built for exactly this kind of detection work, processing signals we can barely notice. If a person can catch it, an algorithm designed for statistical analysis should be operating on a whole different level. The skepticism makes sense given the track record, but the underlying capability? That's not really up for debate.