The Hypercroc protocol has built a pretty interesting yield model—not just the usual short-term high-interest approach, but more like accumulating long-term value by locking in liquidity. Passive income is common in DeFi, but it’s rare to see projects that combine the "flywheel effect" with value retention.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VitaliksTwin
· 5h ago
The flywheel effect sounds appealing, but the key is whether liquidity can truly be retained, rather than becoming just another Ponzi scheme.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 5h ago
honestly the flywheel angle sounds nice on paper but let's see if their governance actually survives first contact with a real attack vector. most protocols talking about "value retention" just mean they've locked in enough LPs to make a fork prohibitively expensive... for now. curious how long before someone stress tests the tokenomics assumptions here.
Reply0
TokenSleuth
· 5h ago
This liquidity accumulation model really has something to it; it's much more reliable than those coins that skyrocket and crash in a single day.
The Hypercroc protocol has built a pretty interesting yield model—not just the usual short-term high-interest approach, but more like accumulating long-term value by locking in liquidity. Passive income is common in DeFi, but it’s rare to see projects that combine the "flywheel effect" with value retention.