Leemon Baird dropped some bold claims about $HBAR's architecture. He's calling it a third-generation distributed ledger—not your typical blockchain setup. The real kicker? Scalability isn't just a promise here. According to Baird, the network's ability to expand isn't based on wishful engineering or trial-and-error patches. It's mathematically guaranteed. That's the kind of certainty most crypto projects can't touch. No hand-waving, no "we're working on it." Just math.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SlowLearnerWang
· 1h ago
It's the same third generation, mathematically guaranteed rhetoric... I should have heard this many times already, so why am I only now realizing that HBAR is actually a bit different? I'm really so slow.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCat
· 1h ago
Mathematical guarantee? Sounds good... but I still want to see the TPS data first. Just talking without action is an old trick.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokens
· 1h ago
Mathematical guarantees? Sounds good, but who still believes that these days... A bunch of projects have said similar things, but in the end, it's all just hype.
View OriginalReply0
FadCatcher
· 2h ago
Mathematical guarantees? That's what I want to hear... Much more reliable than those empty phrases like "stay tuned."
Leemon Baird dropped some bold claims about $HBAR's architecture. He's calling it a third-generation distributed ledger—not your typical blockchain setup. The real kicker? Scalability isn't just a promise here. According to Baird, the network's ability to expand isn't based on wishful engineering or trial-and-error patches. It's mathematically guaranteed. That's the kind of certainty most crypto projects can't touch. No hand-waving, no "we're working on it." Just math.