2025-12-05 09:25:26

There's trading platforms that feel like walking through a quiet gallery. Then there's ones that hit different—where buying NFTs actually feels like playing.

One project flipped the script and saw user retention jump 40%. Why? They made it fun. Sounds obvious, but most platforms still treat collecting like filling out spreadsheets.

Their moves? Let people trade without connecting wallets first. Share 100% of fees back with the community. These aren't just tweaks—they're middle fingers to the boring old playbook.

This is what real onboarding looks like. Not another tutorial. Not another "connect wallet" gate. Just lower the floor, make it engaging, and watch what happens when friction disappears.

The NFT space doesn't need more museums. It needs more spaces where people actually want to hang out.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CexIsBad

· 5h ago

Is this a new trick to manipulate retention data, or has something truly changed?

View OriginalReply0

TestnetScholar

· 12-06 07:42

A 40% retention rate is pretty impressive, but honestly, being able to play without even needing to connect a wallet first? That’s really understanding the users.

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 12-06 05:22

Haha, finally someone said it. Most platforms are just playing word games. You can play without even connecting a wallet? That’s what truly wanting users looks like, not just shouting about Web3 democratization every day. 100% of the fees go back to the community... Alright, I’ll be watching.

View OriginalReply0

PumpAnalyst

· 12-05 14:20

40% retention rate? I’ll have to check the on-chain data to believe it. Don’t tell me it’s just more self-hype from the project team. But to be fair, lowering the entry barrier really does hit a pain point... Wait, hold on, 100% fee refund? How is that sustainable? What about the house? Feels like someone’s trying to fleece a new batch of newbies again. --- Free transactions sound great, but who’s actually footing the bill? Let’s be real—it’s still the newcomers. --- Anyone daring enough to operate like this would’ve gone under by now. There’s definitely something fishy here—I need to keep an eye on it. --- Whether I play or not aside, I’ve never seen a zero-fee platform survive more than a year. --- Now this is what I call product logic. The other platforms’ approaches really should be scrapped, but you still have to watch out for risks.

View OriginalReply0

EternalMiner

· 12-05 09:55

Honestly, most platforms are still making it as boring as doing taxes... I like this approach of letting users play first and connect their wallet later.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 12-05 09:54

Absolutely right, most platforms are just playing number games these days—it's no fun at all. Daring to share 100% of the fees? That's what real respect for the community looks like. Other platforms should take note.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticLayer

· 12-05 09:49

To be honest, this approach sounds good, but there are very few platforms that can actually execute it... most of them are just pretending.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 12-05 09:48

Damn, someone finally brought this up. Most platforms are really too quiet.

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 12-05 09:41

Holy shit, really? A 40% retention rate just because they removed the wallet connection step?