$7.8 Million ETH Chain Transfers: Mysterious Addresses Relay Nearly 2,500 Ethereum

2025-12-08 12:18:19

Abstract generation in progress

[Bitpush] On-chain data shows a notable ETH movement tonight around 20:06.

Someone unwrapped 2,480 ETH from the WETH contract, which was worth about $7.8 million at the time, and sent it directly to an address starting with 0xEB17.

Right after, this address didn’t stay idle; it almost immediately transferred nearly all the ETH (specifically 2,479.99999 ETH) to another wallet starting with 0xcfE4.

Such a chain of transfers could indicate asset allocation or someone shifting positions. The exact intent is unclear, but this scale of fund movement is definitely worth keeping an eye on.

ETH-4.72%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoWageSlave

· 12-10 19:39

7.8 million dollars just keeps turning like this, I really can't tell what they're trying to do

View OriginalReply0

blocksnark

· 12-08 12:42

$7.8 million moving around like this in one night, I really can't make sense of it.

View OriginalReply0

ResearchChadButBroke

· 12-08 12:36

$7.8 million moved so smoothly, whose hand is this steady... I just want to know what the next project is.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTrapper

· 12-08 12:33

lmao the classic "hot potato" shuffle... actually if you read the contract, this smells like textbook vesting unlock into coordinated dump. been calling this pattern for months ngl

Reply0

LuckyBlindCat

· 12-08 12:26

Same old trick again: mysterious addresses passing the baton, basically playing hide-and-seek.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 12-08 12:23

7.8 million dollars just circulating like this, sneaky as hell—what are they up to? Could it be another whale manipulating the market again?

View OriginalReply0