The market has been oscillating back and forth these past couple of days, and I haven’t really felt like opening any new positions. In times like these, it’s better to put your mind to work than your hands. So I took the opportunity to review my RWA positions, logic, yields, and potential risks, and also added a bit more to my GAIB holdings with the profits I made from that. In the current market rhythm, being able to keep your hands off is already a win.
There’s always a new hot topic, but there are very few projects that actually deliver beyond all the hype.
Among the current batch of RWA projects, more and more are entering the results phase—the timelines I have show launches scheduled gradually from this month through January, almost in sync with USDai. In other words, the shoes are about to start dropping.
I’ll do a deep dive into Theo @Theo_Network later.
From a stablecoin perspective, it’s essentially a tokenized US Treasury fund. Its risk structure, yield model, and regulatory framework are among the more “solid” ones in RWA. No matter how the market sentiment swings, its fundamentals won’t collapse overnight.
My approach to allocating positions has also changed:
Big money, I stay away from purely hype-driven projects.
Small money, I can take a punt on YT.
If I can afford to lose it, it’s called an opportunity; if I can’t, it’s just risk.
The biggest lesson GAIB taught me wasn’t about price swings, but that projects without interest protection are only for short-term plays.
Sell when you can—don’t fantasize that every project will make it to the “realization” stage. At this point, YT isn’t a “speculation tool” for me, but more like a way to manage risk with controlled losses.
If I profit, it’s a premium.
If I lose, it’s within expectations.
So I set four rules for myself: if any one of them doesn’t match, I won’t go in big:
YT Four Principles:
1) Token launch timeline must be locked in—no vagueness, no endless delays. 2) Downside must be calculable, not based on luck. 3) Treat the position like a lottery ticket—don’t touch living expenses or core holdings. 4) Token launch is more important than the narrative—delivery > storytelling.
Theo basically hits all four, so I’m in, but I won’t FOMO or go all in.
For me, it’s not about “betting on a moonshot,” but rather:
Fair odds, clear timeline, and rational positioning beyond emotions.
We’re no longer in that era where you could just ape in and make money.
The market has returned to the most fundamental truth:
Being able to calculate risk is more important than listening to someone talk about the future.
People who truly understand this usually don’t lose too badly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The market has been oscillating back and forth these past couple of days, and I haven’t really felt like opening any new positions. In times like these, it’s better to put your mind to work than your hands. So I took the opportunity to review my RWA positions, logic, yields, and potential risks, and also added a bit more to my GAIB holdings with the profits I made from that. In the current market rhythm, being able to keep your hands off is already a win.
There’s always a new hot topic, but there are very few projects that actually deliver beyond all the hype.
Among the current batch of RWA projects, more and more are entering the results phase—the timelines I have show launches scheduled gradually from this month through January, almost in sync with USDai. In other words, the shoes are about to start dropping.
I’ll do a deep dive into Theo @Theo_Network later.
From a stablecoin perspective, it’s essentially a tokenized US Treasury fund. Its risk structure, yield model, and regulatory framework are among the more “solid” ones in RWA. No matter how the market sentiment swings, its fundamentals won’t collapse overnight.
My approach to allocating positions has also changed:
Big money, I stay away from purely hype-driven projects.
Small money, I can take a punt on YT.
If I can afford to lose it, it’s called an opportunity; if I can’t, it’s just risk.
The biggest lesson GAIB taught me wasn’t about price swings, but that projects without interest protection are only for short-term plays.
Sell when you can—don’t fantasize that every project will make it to the “realization” stage.
At this point, YT isn’t a “speculation tool” for me, but more like a way to manage risk with controlled losses.
If I profit, it’s a premium.
If I lose, it’s within expectations.
So I set four rules for myself: if any one of them doesn’t match, I won’t go in big:
YT Four Principles:
1) Token launch timeline must be locked in—no vagueness, no endless delays.
2) Downside must be calculable, not based on luck.
3) Treat the position like a lottery ticket—don’t touch living expenses or core holdings.
4) Token launch is more important than the narrative—delivery > storytelling.
Theo basically hits all four, so I’m in, but I won’t FOMO or go all in.
For me, it’s not about “betting on a moonshot,” but rather:
Fair odds, clear timeline, and rational positioning beyond emotions.
We’re no longer in that era where you could just ape in and make money.
The market has returned to the most fundamental truth:
Being able to calculate risk is more important than listening to someone talk about the future.
People who truly understand this usually don’t lose too badly.
Stay steady, and leave the rest to time.
@KaitoAI #Yapping #MadewithMoss @MossAI_Official #Starboard @Galxe @RiverdotInc @River4fun