Yesterday, my friend sent me a video, and the content of the video was: After the girl broke up with her ex, she went straight to learn dance and wanted to be the kind of person he could never catch up with. To be honest, I was really stunned for a few seconds when I saw that dancing video - not moved, but sober: some people really turn loss into motivation, and people like me who lament "can't catch up" in front of the screen can only silently give a thumbs up 👍.

It is in this complex emotion that the @0xMiden I have recently studied is becoming clearer. Its design logic is actually the same as this video: silent and not noisy, but quietly changed a runway, so that others could not catch up at all.

The privacy model of traditional rollups is a bit like a unified textbook, either transparent to the end or black box to the end. I always feel that something is not going well. Miden, on the other hand, directly changes its thinking, pulling the computation from the chain to the user's local area, breaking down the pressure of "the whole network together" into "independent state units", and the chain only needs to verify a STARK proof.

This means that users' assets, logic, and interactions can be completely processed on their own devices, open on demand, hidden on demand, such as turning "on-chain life" into "personal territory", you decide how big the door is, you decide who can enter. Private, but compliant; Complex, but orderly.

Coupled with Miden VM's auto-generated proofs, recursive proofs, and Rust architecture, "high performance + privacy + decentralized control" can be established at the same time. Polygon's incubation, independent financing, and long-term layout all show that it is not a temporary technical show, but a project that patiently builds the underlying future applications.

Thinking of this, I suddenly felt that some projects, like some people, do not need to be proven to anyone, as long as they continue to move forward, the future will naturally widen the distance.

@KaitoAI #KAITO