Last week, the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) abruptly issued a ban on Kalshi, Robinhood, and a crypto exchange for “engaging in unlicensed online gambling through sporting event contracts.” It came quite suddenly - just after the ban was issued on December 2, Kalshi took DCP directly to court the next day.
However, the plot quickly took a turn. On Monday, federal judge Vernon Oliver ruled that during the hearing of Kalshi’s emergency application, the DCP must stop and cannot take enforcement action against Kalshi. The timeline given by the court is as follows: DCP has until January 9 to submit its response, Kalshi has until January 30 to supplement supporting documents, and the two sides will argue in person in court in mid-February.
What is interesting about this case is where is the line between prediction markets and traditional gambling? Kalshi obviously doesn’t intend to recognize this “gambling” hat. The legal confrontation in the coming months is expected to set the tone for the entire prediction market industry.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DecentralizeMe
· 12-11 09:03
This is getting interesting. DCP hasn't even reacted, and Kalshi has countered with a lawsuit. The legal team is top-notch.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 12-10 07:10
Kalshi's reaction speed was amazing, and the DCP was held down by the court before he could react, haha
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 12-10 07:10
Is the line between prediction markets and gambling really so hard to distinguish? To put it bluntly, it's all about gambling...
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 12-10 06:58
Kalshi directly attacked the government, and I like to watch this kind of hard operation
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXM
· 12-10 06:56
Prediction markets vs gambling, this line is really getting blurred
Connecticut accused Kalshi of engaging in "unlicensed gambling," prompting a judge to urgently halt law enforcement
Last week, the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) abruptly issued a ban on Kalshi, Robinhood, and a crypto exchange for “engaging in unlicensed online gambling through sporting event contracts.” It came quite suddenly - just after the ban was issued on December 2, Kalshi took DCP directly to court the next day.
However, the plot quickly took a turn. On Monday, federal judge Vernon Oliver ruled that during the hearing of Kalshi’s emergency application, the DCP must stop and cannot take enforcement action against Kalshi. The timeline given by the court is as follows: DCP has until January 9 to submit its response, Kalshi has until January 30 to supplement supporting documents, and the two sides will argue in person in court in mid-February.
What is interesting about this case is where is the line between prediction markets and traditional gambling? Kalshi obviously doesn’t intend to recognize this “gambling” hat. The legal confrontation in the coming months is expected to set the tone for the entire prediction market industry.