【Blockchain Rhythm】B. Riley Wealth’s Chief Market Strategist Art Hogan recently offered an interesting observation — this rate cut has a strongly hawkish tone.
On the surface, two members voted against the change, advocating to leave interest rates unchanged. But what’s truly noteworthy is the information revealed by the dot plot: surprisingly, six members believe that a rate cut should not have been considered at this meeting at all. What does this imply? The hawkish signals conveyed by the dot plot are actually much more aggressive than the two dissenting votes publicly expressed.
In simple terms, this move by the Federal Reserve essentially raises the bar for the next rate cut. If the market still expects easing, it might need to rethink that expectation. The direction of monetary policy is more crucial than what appears on the surface.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainDetective
· 18h ago
Oh wow, the dot matrix chart trick is really clever. Six committee members secretly opposed, which is much more ruthless than openly voting against. That's how the Federal Reserve plays mind games.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOmonster
· 12-12 09:31
The dot matrix chart is the real killer move. Six committee members secretly oppose it; on the surface, they cut interest rates, but in reality, they are undermining the foundation. This tactic is brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 12-11 06:25
Wow, six people oppose? The dot matrix chart is the real story, who are you fooling with superficial articles?
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruant
· 12-10 20:12
The dot matrix chart's move is really full of hints everywhere. Six committee members oppose rate cuts? These numbers are even more aggressive than the apparent dissent votes.
With such a strong hawkish tone, no wonder the crypto world has been so bleak these past two days... The Federal Reserve is just playing word games.
Next time they want to cut rates again? The threshold probably will reach the sky. I feel the easing dreams should come to an end.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreather
· 12-10 20:08
Wow, the dot matrix chart is the real killer move. The invisible opposition from six committee members outnumbers the two public opposition votes... The Federal Reserve's strategy is quite ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 12-10 20:01
Wait, six members oppose? Are there even more hawkish signals in that dot plot? The Federal Reserve is really digging a hole for the market—say one thing publicly, do another behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 12-10 19:57
6 members oppose interest rate cuts? The dot plot's move indeed hints strongly; superficial tactics can't fool people.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 12-10 19:51
Six people oppose? This pixel chart is just ridiculous to look at, surface-level on the outside but different behind the scenes. The Fed's move is really a bit dirty. Want to cut interest rates next time? The threshold has risen, everyone.
The Fed's interest rate cut this time is not simple: the hawkish signals revealed by the dot plot are stronger than you think
【Blockchain Rhythm】B. Riley Wealth’s Chief Market Strategist Art Hogan recently offered an interesting observation — this rate cut has a strongly hawkish tone.
On the surface, two members voted against the change, advocating to leave interest rates unchanged. But what’s truly noteworthy is the information revealed by the dot plot: surprisingly, six members believe that a rate cut should not have been considered at this meeting at all. What does this imply? The hawkish signals conveyed by the dot plot are actually much more aggressive than the two dissenting votes publicly expressed.
In simple terms, this move by the Federal Reserve essentially raises the bar for the next rate cut. If the market still expects easing, it might need to rethink that expectation. The direction of monetary policy is more crucial than what appears on the surface.