【BitPush】The development path of the Solana ecosystem has given me an interesting insight.
At the recent industry conference, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko discussed his understanding of decentralization. He emphasized that decentralization does not mean the absence of leaders; rather, it is the emergence of diverse leadership — over the past five years, talents from the Foundation, ecosystem companies, as well as completely independent community developers, application, and protocol builders, have proactively taken on leadership responsibilities for the network.
Most interestingly, he described a shift in his own role. He has now given up his commit rights on GitHub, and his public speeches have been shortened to about two minutes. He openly stated that his goal is to sit in the audience and watch the ecosystem operate — in his view, this change is a sign that the network is truly mature and has gained independent vitality.
This story reflects what a mature ecosystem should look like: not a one-man show driven by the founder, but a dynamic balance promoted by multiple stakeholders. As more builders step up to take responsibility, the network’s resilience actually becomes stronger. This evolution from centralization to decentralization may indeed be the true practice of decentralization.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractPlumber
· 12-15 06:51
That set of explanations sounds quite nice, but I have to be honest — the biggest concern with decentralization is the "hidden control" after power transfer. Giving up GitHub permissions is easy, but where is the real control? Validator distribution? Fund flows? Or perhaps the founders have stepped back, but the behind-the-scenes foundation and ecosystem companies are actually still run by them? I've seen too many projects use the same story to explain decentralization, only to find during audits that the permission architecture is a complete mess. That’s what I really care about.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 12-14 12:40
I think this guy's idea is correct, but very few can actually do it. Giving up power is easy to say.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 12-13 06:52
This is true decentralization, not just slogans but actions.
Anatoly's move is brilliant; abandoning authority to understand what delegation really means.
I love the details in his two-minute speech, haha.
It feels like he's genuinely willing to step back behind the scenes and watch the ecosystem run itself — that's maturity.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 12-12 17:29
Few projects truly empower their founders, but Solana's move here is quite impressive.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 12-12 08:18
Listen, I believe this set of arguments, but in practice, it's a different story... SOL still feels somewhat centralized at the moment.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterBearish
· 12-12 08:15
Really? The founder actively stepping down? That's a rare species in the crypto world.
Honestly, this is true decentralization, not just lip service.
SOL's move was pretty clever; I finally understand.
But it seems like this kind of transition requires a lot of self-control from the founder...
With the current turmoil in the SOL ecosystem, can they really hold on?
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 12-12 08:15
Give up GitHub permissions? This guy really wants to step down, unlike some project teams that only talk about decentralization but still hold the power to life and death.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 12-12 08:04
Really? The founder stepping back voluntarily? If it were another project, they would have already run away, haha.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 12-12 07:59
This is true decentralization, not just a slogan but real action. Anatoly's move this time is absolutely brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 12-12 07:51
I need to think this through... Regarding Anatoly giving up the submission rights, is it truly decentralization or just stepping back and letting others take the blame, haha.
Really, the founders are just hiding behind the scenes watching the show, feeling a bit... "too smart," maybe.
But on the other hand, SOL has indeed turned things around by bottom-fishing the ecosystem in the past two years, so there might be some truth to it.
But I feel like this explanation... might just be an excuse to reduce their workload. Who knows?
From the founder stepping back behind the scenes, see how the Solana network achieves true decentralization
【BitPush】The development path of the Solana ecosystem has given me an interesting insight.
At the recent industry conference, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko discussed his understanding of decentralization. He emphasized that decentralization does not mean the absence of leaders; rather, it is the emergence of diverse leadership — over the past five years, talents from the Foundation, ecosystem companies, as well as completely independent community developers, application, and protocol builders, have proactively taken on leadership responsibilities for the network.
Most interestingly, he described a shift in his own role. He has now given up his commit rights on GitHub, and his public speeches have been shortened to about two minutes. He openly stated that his goal is to sit in the audience and watch the ecosystem operate — in his view, this change is a sign that the network is truly mature and has gained independent vitality.
This story reflects what a mature ecosystem should look like: not a one-man show driven by the founder, but a dynamic balance promoted by multiple stakeholders. As more builders step up to take responsibility, the network’s resilience actually becomes stronger. This evolution from centralization to decentralization may indeed be the true practice of decentralization.