Recently, ZEC has exhibited a classic bearish signal. Starting from the resistance level around 415, the price faced downward pressure and ultimately dropped to the vicinity of 370, a decline of over 10%. The accuracy of this move warrants a review—from the peak to the breakdown, it almost left no room for the bulls to breathe.
From the candlestick structure, the bearish divergence at the high levels of ZEC is already quite evident. Trading volume has gradually decreased, while the price has surged higher. This divergence often indicates a weakening of upward momentum. Once this structure is broken, the likelihood of a decline significantly increases.
Compared to the $BTC and $ETH movements during the same period, ZEC's performance reflects the market’s re-pricing of risk appetite for smaller coins. When the overall trend is volatile, capital tends to be more cautious. This is also why technical analysis becomes particularly crucial in the current market environment.
Going forward, focus on whether ZEC can find support at the 370 level and whether it will face resistance around 400 during a rebound. From a larger cycle perspective, the Federal Reserve’s policy direction remains a key background factor influencing overall risk assets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchroedingerMiner
· 1h ago
Can 370 rebound again? I'm unsure; no one wants small-cap coins right now.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineNewbie
· 1h ago
It's that top divergence again, always accurate... Why not buy more?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrant
· 12-19 23:26
Bullish divergence is just talk, but when it actually breaks... the money is gone already.
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClick
· 12-18 02:18
Such a clear top divergence, you should have exited early. Why are you still picking up the bag below 370 now? Small-cap coins have really been dragged down by Bitcoin in this wave.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggee
· 12-18 02:14
Small coins getting chopped, this wave of ZEC breaking down is just too straightforward. Bulls really have no way out.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 12-18 02:11
The on-chain footprint behind the 370 support level is worth tracking. Were there any dormant wallets awakening within that range? I did notice some suspicious fund transfer patterns, with early coin-holding addresses showing unusual activity.
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhale
· 12-18 02:02
If the 370 support breaks, it will directly head to 350. Top divergence and such things look simple but are actually very difficult to execute. Anyway, I'm already trapped...
#美联储降息 ZEC Technical Review and Future Outlook
Recently, ZEC has exhibited a classic bearish signal. Starting from the resistance level around 415, the price faced downward pressure and ultimately dropped to the vicinity of 370, a decline of over 10%. The accuracy of this move warrants a review—from the peak to the breakdown, it almost left no room for the bulls to breathe.
From the candlestick structure, the bearish divergence at the high levels of ZEC is already quite evident. Trading volume has gradually decreased, while the price has surged higher. This divergence often indicates a weakening of upward momentum. Once this structure is broken, the likelihood of a decline significantly increases.
Compared to the $BTC and $ETH movements during the same period, ZEC's performance reflects the market’s re-pricing of risk appetite for smaller coins. When the overall trend is volatile, capital tends to be more cautious. This is also why technical analysis becomes particularly crucial in the current market environment.
Going forward, focus on whether ZEC can find support at the 370 level and whether it will face resistance around 400 during a rebound. From a larger cycle perspective, the Federal Reserve’s policy direction remains a key background factor influencing overall risk assets.