Snap a screenshot of your portfolio at peak gains, and suddenly you've got an interesting problem. Even if everything tanks tomorrow and your holdings become worthless, that screenshot? Still there. Still owns the same visual proof of wealth. Nothing technically changed about the image itself—it's still rare, still limited, still exists on your device. This is actually the wild concept behind why people treat digital artifacts the way they do. The permanence of a screenshot outlasts market cycles. What does that say about how we value things in the digital age?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MysteryBoxOpener
· 19h ago
Haha, that's hilarious. That's why I have a hundred screenshots stored on my phone.
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 19h ago
Haha, the thing about eternal screenshots is indeed unbeatable, more resilient than real holdings.
View OriginalReply0
DevChive
· 19h ago
Haha, this is why my phone is full of full-position screenshots.
Snap a screenshot of your portfolio at peak gains, and suddenly you've got an interesting problem. Even if everything tanks tomorrow and your holdings become worthless, that screenshot? Still there. Still owns the same visual proof of wealth. Nothing technically changed about the image itself—it's still rare, still limited, still exists on your device. This is actually the wild concept behind why people treat digital artifacts the way they do. The permanence of a screenshot outlasts market cycles. What does that say about how we value things in the digital age?