In response to the recent phishing attack involving 50 million USDT, the Ethereum Community Foundation calls for the cessation of using address ellipses for display, pointing out that truncated addresses pose security risks in certain Wallet UI designs. During this attack, a Whale mistakenly transferred a large sum of money by copying "similar addresses," which ultimately was laundered into ETH and withdrawn via Tornado.
In the context of high-frequency transfers and large asset operations, how should we balance wallet experience and security? Who should bear the responsibility, the user, the wallet, or the infrastructure? Welcome to discuss.)
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
1 Likes
Reward
1
1
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HaonanChen
· 18h ago
The market is so chaotic that I think safety should come first.
In response to the recent phishing attack involving 50 million USDT, the Ethereum Community Foundation calls for the cessation of using address ellipses for display, pointing out that truncated addresses pose security risks in certain Wallet UI designs. During this attack, a Whale mistakenly transferred a large sum of money by copying "similar addresses," which ultimately was laundered into ETH and withdrawn via Tornado.
In the context of high-frequency transfers and large asset operations, how should we balance wallet experience and security? Who should bear the responsibility, the user, the wallet, or the infrastructure? Welcome to discuss.)