In response to the recent phishing attack involving 50 million USDT, the Ethereum Community Foundation calls for the cessation of using address ellipses for display, pointing out that truncated addresses pose security risks in certain Wallet UI designs. During this attack, a Whale mistakenly transferred a large sum of money by copying "similar addresses," which ultimately was laundered into ETH and withdrawn via Tornado.



In the context of high-frequency transfers and large asset operations, how should we balance wallet experience and security? Who should bear the responsibility, the user, the wallet, or the infrastructure? Welcome to discuss.)
ETH-0.53%
View Original
post-image
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 1
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HaonanChenvip
· 18h ago
The market is so chaotic that I think safety should come first.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)