#稳定币风险与合规 Seeing the moves by Stripe and Paradigm, I have to say it's quite interesting. Tempo's fixed fee model (0.1 cents per transaction) indeed hits the pain point of stablecoin payments—traditional on-chain congestion causes fees to skyrocket, which is a nightmare for high-frequency payment scenarios.

But we need to look at this calmly. The entry of traditional financial institutions like UBS and Deutsche Bank appears to signal the green light for stablecoin applications, but what does it actually reflect? Regulatory pressure. The entry of large banks means that a regulatory framework is taking shape, which introduces new variables for the risk pricing of stablecoins.

From a copy trading perspective, this type of news often attracts short-term trend-chasing traders. But my advice is: don't rush to follow accounts that aggressively increase their positions based on positive sentiment. Instead, focus on those traders who can maintain position discipline in the face of policy changes and can quickly adjust their stop losses—these are the ones who truly understand the changes in the stablecoin ecosystem.

The opportunities in the stablecoin space do not lie in emotions, but in whether one can accurately pinpoint the balance between policy and technology. Good copy trading targets should now be building a more cautious risk control framework, rather than chasing highs.