🚩From 2026 Onward: Crypto VCs Are Changing Their Investment Playbook
- In past cycles, crypto VC investing was driven more by narratives than business models. Fundraising success depended less on cash flow and more on how compelling and “new” the story was.
👉That model has now hit its limits.
> The old loop was simple:
New narrative → user incentives & airdrops → growth metrics → fundraising → token launch as an exit.
Tokens were treated as the business model, and TGE often marked the peak - not the beginning.
This approach worked in strong bull markets, but repeatedly failed after downturns.
Projects like @Stepnofficial showed that narratives and incentives can drive short-term growth, but without real demand and revenue, the model collapses fast.
⛳Post-correction, VCs face two realities:
Token launches are no longer reliable exits.
Market liquidity can’t absorb large unlocks like before.
As a result, VCs are shifting back to fundamentals:
❓Who pays? Is revenue recurring? How do compliance, ops, and liquidity affect margins?
This is why many crypto startups now resemble @stripe (payments) or @RobinhoodApp (trading & brokerage) using crypto and stablecoins as infrastructure, not as the product itself.
With tighter regulation and weaker exit assumptions, only projects that can generate real revenue, sustain cash flow, and scale like real businesses will survive.
- What’s your take on this shift?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
🚩From 2026 Onward: Crypto VCs Are Changing Their Investment Playbook
- In past cycles, crypto VC investing was driven more by narratives than business models. Fundraising success depended less on cash flow and more on how compelling and “new” the story was.
👉That model has now hit its limits.
> The old loop was simple:
New narrative → user incentives & airdrops → growth metrics → fundraising → token launch as an exit.
Tokens were treated as the business model, and TGE often marked the peak - not the beginning.
This approach worked in strong bull markets, but repeatedly failed after downturns.
Projects like @Stepnofficial showed that narratives and incentives can drive short-term growth, but without real demand and revenue, the model collapses fast.
⛳Post-correction, VCs face two realities:
Token launches are no longer reliable exits.
Market liquidity can’t absorb large unlocks like before.
As a result, VCs are shifting back to fundamentals:
❓Who pays? Is revenue recurring? How do compliance, ops, and liquidity affect margins?
This is why many crypto startups now resemble @stripe (payments) or @RobinhoodApp (trading & brokerage) using crypto and stablecoins as infrastructure, not as the product itself.
✅Bottom line:
From 2026, crypto VCs aren’t abandoning crypto they’re abandoning narrative-only investing.
With tighter regulation and weaker exit assumptions, only projects that can generate real revenue, sustain cash flow, and scale like real businesses will survive.
- What’s your take on this shift?