#分享我的交易

#ShareMyTrade

This trade didn’t start with the entry button.
It started much earlier with context, patience and accepting what the market was actually offering instead of what I wanted it to do.

Before I get into numbers, I want to talk about why this ETHUSDT short made sense to me at that moment, because good trades are usually built before price moves, not after screenshots.

📊 Market context before the trade

Going into this setup, ETH was trading in a very familiar environment post-expansion, low momentum continuation. The broader market had already shown signs of exhaustion after a strong push and ETH specifically was struggling to hold above key intraday resistance levels.

What stood out to me was the loss of follow-through on higher timeframes. Every attempt to push higher was getting absorbed quickly. Instead of impulsive buying, price action showed hesitation long upper wicks, weak closes and declining momentum. That’s often a signal that buyers are no longer in control, even if price hasn’t collapsed yet.

Another important factor was correlation behavior. While BTC was moving sideways and showing indecision, ETH was underperforming. That relative weakness matters. When the market pauses, the weaker asset usually breaks first and ETH was showing that vulnerability clearly.

Liquidity was also a key part of my bias. There was visible liquidity resting above recent highs, and price had already swept enough downside liquidity earlier. That imbalance suggested a potential fake push higher or distribution phase before continuation lower.

So the context was simple:

• Trend was tired

• Momentum was fading

• ETH was relatively weak

• Liquidity favored downside

I wasn’t looking to predict a crash. I was looking to trade inefficiency.

🎯 Why I selected this trade

I chose ETHUSDT for one reason: clarity.
Some pairs look tempting but messy. ETH, at that moment, was clean. The structure was readable, the levels respected, and the reactions were consistent. When I see that, I don’t overthink it clarity is an edge.
The level around my entry was not random. It aligned with:

• A prior rejection zone

• A short-term supply area

• Weak reclaim attempts

Price pushed into that area, but instead of acceptance, it stalled. Volume didn’t expand. Momentum indicators stayed flat. That’s often where late longs get trapped.
This wasn’t a “top call.”

It was a reaction trade responding to what price failed to do.

I also liked the risk-to-reward profile. The invalidation was clear. If price accepted above the zone, I’d be wrong quickly. That’s important. I prefer trades where I know early if I’m wrong, instead of hoping.

🧠 Strategy used

This was a momentum-fade short, combined with liquidity awareness and structure confirmation.

In simple terms:

• I waited for price to move into resistance

• I watched how it behaved there

• I entered when momentum failed

No indicators cluttering the chart. No emotional chasing. Just price behavior.
The leverage (23x) was not about aggression it was about precision. Position sizing was controlled, and risk was defined. High leverage without discipline is gambling; high leverage with structure is just a tool.
I didn’t add to the position impulsively. I didn’t move stops emotionally. The plan was set before entry, and I followed it.

📍 Entry, performance and exit

Entry price: 2,961

Direction: Short

Leverage: 23x

After entry, price behaved exactly how I wanted it to slow, controlled downside movement, not a violent dump. That’s often a sign of real selling rather than panic. Sellers stayed in control and buyers failed to reclaim key intraday levels.

As price moved in favor, I didn’t rush to exit. I monitored:

• Speed of the move

• Reaction at minor supports

• Volume behaviour

The market gave continuation without significant pullbacks a good sign for holding.

Exit price: around 2,895

ROI: +50.31%

The exit wasn’t because I “felt enough profit.”

It was because momentum started to slow near a short-term demand zone, and I saw early signs of absorption. I don’t wait for the perfect bottom I take what the market offers when conditions change.

Exiting there protected the gain and respected the plan.

🔍 Performance review

This trade worked not because of leverage or luck but because:

• The bias was aligned with market context

• Entry was taken at a logical location

• Risk was defined

• Exit was disciplined

Could it have gone lower? Possibly.

Do I regret exiting? No.

Consistency comes from repeating good decisions, not from squeezing every last dollar out of a move.

What I’m most satisfied with is the execution quality. No hesitation. No revenge mindset. No FOMO. Just clean decision-making.

🧭 Final thoughts

This trade is a reminder that profitable trading isn’t about being right all the time it’s about being aligned when the market gives clarity.

Shorts are often uncomfortable emotionally, but when structure, momentum, and liquidity line up, they offer some of the cleanest opportunities.

I’ll continue to focus on:

• Context before entry

• Reaction over prediction

• Discipline over excitement

Because that’s how trades like this happen quietly, patiently, and intentionally.

This is my trade, my process and my responsibility.
And I’ll keep sharing them wins and lessons alike.

#ShareMyTrade
$ETH ‌