#AI基础设施投资 CZ's remarks struck a chord with a core issue I've been contemplating recently—the true effectiveness of AI trading strategies. He said it very straightforwardly: if AI strategies can truly generate stable profits, why would project teams sell them to users? This is exactly what I am most cautious about when choosing copy trading partners.

The market is a zero-sum game. When everyone uses the same AI logic, strategies become ineffective. This reminds me of the painful lessons from copying certain "smart traders" earlier this year—good returns in the first three months, followed by a complete explosion later, fundamentally because the strategy lost its informational edge.

But CZ's judgment on the future integration of AI and cryptocurrency is worth noting. If large-scale applications truly emerge, investing in projects related to AI infrastructure now might be like building highways—no matter who is running on them, the infrastructure's value remains. This makes me more inclined to focus on builders who concentrate on foundational technology accumulation rather than short-term profit promises.

This also inspires me to adjust my copy trading strategy: rather than blindly following "AI traders," it's better to focus on those with strong execution capabilities and a long-term vision—those who can adapt to market changes are the real moat. In the early stages of the market, choosing the right people is more critical than choosing the right strategy.