I recently tried out the MAVIA project, and to be honest, the experience was average. In the current era of rapid AI technology iteration, traditional game applications like this are hard to spark interest. Overall, the long-term trend of this type of token is not very optimistic; given the current development pace and lack of creativity, it's hard to imagine it lasting more than 1-2 years.



Actually, this is nothing new. Looking back three years, there were similar Web3 game projects that also saw rapid decline in popularity and eventually were ignored by almost no one. MAVIA's current design approach is quite similar to those projects—outdated mechanisms and no breakthrough innovation. In this space, lacking true differentiation makes it difficult to survive long-term, and users will vote with their feet.
MAVIA0,91%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
BanklessAtHeartvip
· 01-18 13:34
Bro, I agree with this point. MAVIA really doesn't have anything new; it's just the old stuff with a new coat.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 01-18 05:15
Uh, no, the MAVIA routine we saw three years ago. Changing the skin and still trying to trick us into entering?

---

AI has become so competitive that playing this old-fashioned game mechanism is really pointless.

---

Exactly, these kinds of projects are just outdated mechanisms + lack of innovation, they won't last long.

---

Voting with your feet is right; I already gave up long ago, there's nothing new.

---

It feels like MAVIA is just copying and pasting the same old tricks, no wonder the enthusiasm is so cold.

---

Game tokens with average experience, definitely have no long-term prospects.

---

That's why I don't touch this track anymore, it's all repetitive stories.

---

Lack of creativity + slow development equals a dead end.

---

The same old routine from three years ago, just changing the name to continue the scam. No one believes this anymore.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAOvip
· 01-15 16:57
Revisiting the pitfalls from three years ago, this is the equilibrium of the Web3 gaming track — it's always new IPs and new teams, always old mechanisms. I've seen MAVIA's design before; lacking differentiation can't survive a bear market. The idea that users vote with their feet sounds nice, but essentially, the incentives are too distorted.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailedvip
· 01-15 16:57
ngl, seen this exact movie three times already... mavia's basically just copying homework from 2021 projects that already flopped lol
Reply0
DataPickledFishvip
· 01-15 16:56
It's the same old trick again, MAVIA was just copied from projects three years ago.

The experience is terrible, and the mechanism is outdated to the point of falling apart.

To put it simply, it's a lack of imagination and won't last long.

AI has evolved to this level and you're still playing old games? That's really crazy.

Users have already voted with their feet. Are there still people willing to buy these kinds of coins?

Without differentiation, how can they survive? Aren't there enough dead projects in this space?
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaversevip
· 01-15 16:55
It's the same old story again, MAVIA is completely cooled off.

If I had known earlier, there would be no innovation in this kind of thing.

Tired of playing, next one please.

Web3 games need to wake up, really.

With such a bad mechanism, do you still think it can last two years? I doubt it.

No differentiation at all, still trying to scalp users haha.

History always repeats itself, and this time is no exception.

With this quality, how can it compete with AI?

User feedback is correct, that's exactly what I think.

Anyway, I won't touch it anymore, it's too boring.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin