I used to hold 1% of Useless and rode that wave pretty hard. But instead of staying put, I kept peeling off gains to chase shiny new plays—dumped profits into Startup and Kappa thinking I was being clever with my allocation.
Looking back? Terrible move.
Here's what I figured out: taking profits should only happen when you actually *need* the cash to spend. Harvesting winners just to shuffle into laggards is basically punishing your own winners. Now I stick to that rule. You don't exit a runner because you think something else might pop off—that's how you leave money on the table.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OffchainWinner
· 01-16 00:45
Haha, really, I understand this operation too well. I've seen too many people chase hot trends and end up losing everything.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 01-16 00:45
This is a typical case of chasing high and killing low. I've seen too many people lose money this way.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKing
· 01-16 00:32
Only after selling at a profit do you realize that chasing the trend really makes money
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_road
· 01-16 00:30
That's why I hold on tightly now, afraid of getting cut.
I used to hold 1% of Useless and rode that wave pretty hard. But instead of staying put, I kept peeling off gains to chase shiny new plays—dumped profits into Startup and Kappa thinking I was being clever with my allocation.
Looking back? Terrible move.
Here's what I figured out: taking profits should only happen when you actually *need* the cash to spend. Harvesting winners just to shuffle into laggards is basically punishing your own winners. Now I stick to that rule. You don't exit a runner because you think something else might pop off—that's how you leave money on the table.